Notices
Stock JK Tech Bulletin board forum regarding issues with OE (original equipment) components of the Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) such as factory suspension parts, engine, transmission, body parts, interior fixtures and the on-board computer.

Why V6???

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-13-2010, 06:47 PM
  #11  
JK Enthusiast
 
benny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Most people that run their mouths a lot have some sort of inferiority complex. I think I would trade that friend in for a new model.
Old 11-13-2010, 07:14 PM
  #12  
JK Super Freak
 
zerodown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: pine barrens, NJ
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My brother trashes JK's all the time. It's annoying because I don't really step on his toes. He thinks CJs YJs and TJs were real Jeeps and JK's are "not real Jeeps". He had a TJ rubicon for like a year and a half, and drives a chevy colorado now.
Old 11-13-2010, 07:29 PM
  #13  
JK Enthusiast
 
benny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by zerodown
My brother trashes JK's all the time. It's annoying because I don't really step on his toes. He thinks CJs YJs and TJs were real Jeeps and JK's are "not real Jeeps". He had a TJ rubicon for like a year and a half, and drives a chevy colorado now.
Well I would tell you to trade him in too but he's your Brother. Maybe you could just let him know that he drives what is probably the most unreliable, non-truck truck there is.
My Brother used to run his mouth, of course I DID punch him in the nose one time. I thought my Mom was going to kill me. By no means am I saying you should do that though.
Oh well, it makes me think of a line from Back to the future 3,- "Just hot air from a buffoon."
Old 11-13-2010, 07:37 PM
  #14  
JK Super Freak
 
CerOf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zerodown
and drives a chevy colorado now.
That makes me laugh.

There is very little differencebin when the 4l and 3.8l get their power. Go google it for a dyno if you do not believe it.
Old 11-13-2010, 07:43 PM
  #15  
JK Super Freak
 
CerOf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dyno found to prove it. From JP magazine, aka google search
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image-3763176691.jpg
Views:	175
Size:	29.2 KB
ID:	102024  
Old 11-13-2010, 11:12 PM
  #16  
JK Super Freak
 
JKlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah as jeansbro said, gearing has a lot to do with the perception that the JK is underpowered.

The 3.21s that come standard with the 6-speed and the 3.73s that come with the auto are quite tall and though they give decent fuel economy can feel sluggish during acceleration and stop-start city driving. The 4.10s that come with the Rubis make the JK feel more alive.

In reality the V6 produces more power and torque but due to the nature of the V6 design produces this at slightly higher RPMs, so the I6 (with the TJs lower gearing) gives the illusion of being more powerful in the lighter TJ. The I6 was also known as a gas guzzler; you won't hear any TJ owners (apart from maybe the 4-cyl drivers) saying that the I6 was more fuel efficient either.
Old 11-14-2010, 02:51 AM
  #17  
JK Jedi Master
FJOTM Winner

 
Mark Doiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Midwest City, OK
Posts: 14,790
Received 362 Likes on 270 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JKlad
... gives the illusion of being more powerful in the lighter TJ. ...
I think "lighter" is a major factor in the misconception that the TJ's engine puts out more torque and horses. This is especially true for the four doors.
Old 11-14-2010, 10:30 AM
  #18  
JK Enthusiast
 
Bad_CRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mn
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CerOf
Dyno found to prove it. From JP magazine, aka google search

I think this thread is over.


Print that out, hand it to him, and walk away. No need to say anything else.
Old 11-14-2010, 11:53 AM
  #19  
JK Enthusiast
 
mabar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JerseyMark
The 4.0L straight 6 had 190hp and 230 lb-ft torque

The 3.8 has 215hp and 245lb-ft torque
That is not correct. Straight from Jeep.com website for the 2011 Wrangler with the V-6 engine:

202 horsepower @5200 RPM
237 lb-ft torque @ 4000 RPM

Specs for a TJ Wrangler with the 4.0L I-6 Engine are here:

.allpar.com/mopar/40.html[/url]


190 hp @4600 RPM
235 lb-ft torque @3200 RPM

Last edited by mkjeep; 11-14-2010 at 04:26 PM. Reason: no clicky
Old 11-14-2010, 12:00 PM
  #20  
JK Freak
 
JerseyMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Allentown, NJ
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mabar
That is not correct. Straight from Jeep.com website for the 2011 Wrangler with the V-6 engine:

202 horsepower @5200 RPM
237 lb-ft torque @ 4000 RPM

Specs for a TJ Wrangler with the 4.0L I-6 Engine are here:

http://www.allpar.com/mopar/40.html


190 hp @4600 RPM
235 lb-ft torque @3200 RPM
My mistake then. The site I got it from must have been wrong.

Edit: I figured it out, the numbers I quoted were for the minivan 3.8L. It is tuned differently than in our JKs.

Last edited by JerseyMark; 11-14-2010 at 12:04 PM.


Quick Reply: Why V6???



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 AM.