possible problems with some 3.6 pentastar engines
#651
So this is the info I wanted to know...
"Betts said the problem has been found in about half of 1 percent, or about 7,500 of the approximately 1.5 million Pentastar engines that were built over the past two years"
This makes me a feel a little better that I can beat the odds of having problems.
"Betts said the problem has been found in about half of 1 percent, or about 7,500 of the approximately 1.5 million Pentastar engines that were built over the past two years"
This makes me a feel a little better that I can beat the odds of having problems.
#652
Matt I hope all owners are treated that way.
Roy he says they have "found" the problem in .5%. I'm skeptical that it's limited to 7500 heads, I hope I'm wrong.
The reprogram or new lifter process must have cost millions in worthless warranty work for Chrysler on top of head replacement costs.
Roy he says they have "found" the problem in .5%. I'm skeptical that it's limited to 7500 heads, I hope I'm wrong.
The reprogram or new lifter process must have cost millions in worthless warranty work for Chrysler on top of head replacement costs.
#653
So this is the info I wanted to know...
"Betts said the problem has been found in about half of 1 percent, or about 7,500 of the approximately 1.5 million Pentastar engines that were built over the past two years"
This makes me a feel a little better that I can beat the odds of having problems.
"Betts said the problem has been found in about half of 1 percent, or about 7,500 of the approximately 1.5 million Pentastar engines that were built over the past two years"
This makes me a feel a little better that I can beat the odds of having problems.
If you have a 2012 you obviously have a warranty, so the only worries you have are inconvenience, lost time, and possibly stress. I had a head on my 2011 3.8 replaced for ticking, so I know it's discouraging to have a major engine repair at low mileage. I say 2012 owners can feel good knowing they will have their problem fixed one way or another, yet those considering a 2012 or even a 2013 should buy with eyes wide open. I'd love to have the 3.6, but I want to see what happens first. I'm more inclined to hold out for a diesel or the model redesign since I already have the new interior.
#654
I m really suprised they would try to spread the problem out to all pentastars. Other then a few Grand cherokees and All these Wranglers I have not read about this issue in other cars such as challengers or avengers.
I am a meber of about 5 other forums which I will not name because the rules say not too but only on this Forum do I find so many. I would think they would say its mostly Wranglers since there are 12 complaints filed with the governemnt. Where are the other model years or Makes of Pentastars complaints to the feds? I would have expected the complete opposite more like put it all on Wranglers since your going to upset people who probably are already upset because the word of mouth is getting out. Also as noted the heads are supposedly different on the Wrangler then others where as I never heard of the heads being different for the Grand Cherokee or challenger or Journey.
And again on all those other forums there is no where close to anything like this thread. Of course just as someone else stated back in the 90s the transmission failures which were suppose to be isolated and sooner or later all failed.
I m just getting rid of mine. Anyone wana buy it? I didnt think so. AND I also worry about a recall or when this gets out even more or hits the mainstream Media whats that going to do to resale value?? I mean is the 12 Wrangler going to have a reputation as the 2002 Ford Explorer still to this day has as the worst model year ever built and to stay away from them (they had defective rear axles)
I am a meber of about 5 other forums which I will not name because the rules say not too but only on this Forum do I find so many. I would think they would say its mostly Wranglers since there are 12 complaints filed with the governemnt. Where are the other model years or Makes of Pentastars complaints to the feds? I would have expected the complete opposite more like put it all on Wranglers since your going to upset people who probably are already upset because the word of mouth is getting out. Also as noted the heads are supposedly different on the Wrangler then others where as I never heard of the heads being different for the Grand Cherokee or challenger or Journey.
And again on all those other forums there is no where close to anything like this thread. Of course just as someone else stated back in the 90s the transmission failures which were suppose to be isolated and sooner or later all failed.
I m just getting rid of mine. Anyone wana buy it? I didnt think so. AND I also worry about a recall or when this gets out even more or hits the mainstream Media whats that going to do to resale value?? I mean is the 12 Wrangler going to have a reputation as the 2002 Ford Explorer still to this day has as the worst model year ever built and to stay away from them (they had defective rear axles)
#655
I've been following this thread since I bought my 2012 jeep 2 months ago, at first I felt sick knowing I just purchased my first new car and there are people having major problems with them. I drove around paranoid for about a month and a half but have now realized that being paranoid every time I drive is probably worse then having to take my jeep in and get it fixed, so I just turn up my music and enjoy driving.
If I hear this tick, I'll take my jeep in, get a loaner, and tell them I'll pick it up when they show me what's been done and I am happy with it. And if the new heads aren't a permanent fix, I'll cross that path when I get to it, but for now, I'm enjoying my jeep carefree, a vehicle isn't worth losing sleep over in my opinion.
If I hear this tick, I'll take my jeep in, get a loaner, and tell them I'll pick it up when they show me what's been done and I am happy with it. And if the new heads aren't a permanent fix, I'll cross that path when I get to it, but for now, I'm enjoying my jeep carefree, a vehicle isn't worth losing sleep over in my opinion.
#656
well here we go i had been hearing it slightly and waiting for good time to take it in, just began to notice a pretty significant drop in fuel economy (i have 3100 miles on mine, way to soon to be loosing fuel mileage!) so i made time and brought it in to a different dealer then i had bought it from today, since i bought it at home in illinois but am stationed in nc. good news is i played it stupidish with they guys there and they said they heard it definately asked what they plan to do to fix it, he said typically they are putting new heads on right off the bat there, but they will call me, which is a good sign. and the only benefit to all this is that when i asked about how long a new head would take to come in if thats the case the guy told me they have a whole bunch in the shop waiting, which kind of makes me think he bs'd me abit about having "just a few come in" lol but we shall see where it goes from here, the service staff seemed helpful and understanding. i will keep you all posted.
Thanks for your service! And whatever you do, get it fixed there. Like politicians in Illinois, the dealers here are a bunch of liars and crooks. I should have you take mine with you and get it fixed there!
#658
From the article.
So did they just inadvertently say that ANY 3.6 will start ticking if you drive it a certain way and with a certain fuel mixture in a certain pattern over time? Obviously they figured out how to reproduce the problem and cause the issue to manifest itself. So I'm wondering what all the people with this problem use for fuel (ethanol content, octane levels), how they drive (hard, slow, highway, city), and how often they drive.
Isn't that the measure of a design defect: when it can happen to anyone? How does the fact that it's rare make it not a design defect?
He said the malfunctions were the result of "an interaction of a lot of rare things that ultimately come together to affect a small percentage of the population." Those could include different fuel mixes and the way the vehicle is driven, he said, though he did not explain further.
Lee said there are limits to the percentage of Pentastars that will experience the malfunction because of the variables involved.
"You have to have this fuel characteristic, you have to have this drive cycle -- and all of these things have to line up in order to have this situation occur," Lee said. "That's why" the number of potentially affected engines "is so small. If it were a design defect, or if it affected [a basic component] like the integrated exhaust, we'd have issues on everything, which we don't."
Lee said there are limits to the percentage of Pentastars that will experience the malfunction because of the variables involved.
"You have to have this fuel characteristic, you have to have this drive cycle -- and all of these things have to line up in order to have this situation occur," Lee said. "That's why" the number of potentially affected engines "is so small. If it were a design defect, or if it affected [a basic component] like the integrated exhaust, we'd have issues on everything, which we don't."
Isn't that the measure of a design defect: when it can happen to anyone? How does the fact that it's rare make it not a design defect?
Last edited by JamesWyatt; 08-13-2012 at 08:44 PM. Reason: syntax
#659
From the article.
So did they just inadvertently say that ANY 3.6 will start ticking if you drive it a certain way and with a certain fuel mixture in a certain pattern over time? Obviously they figured out how to reproduce the problem and cause the issue to manifest itself. So I'm wondering what all the people with this problem use for fuel (ethanol content, octane levels), how they drive (hard, slow, highway, city), and how often they drive.
Isn't that the measure of a design defect: when it can happen to anyone? How does the fact that it's rare make it not a design defect?
So did they just inadvertently say that ANY 3.6 will start ticking if you drive it a certain way and with a certain fuel mixture in a certain pattern over time? Obviously they figured out how to reproduce the problem and cause the issue to manifest itself. So I'm wondering what all the people with this problem use for fuel (ethanol content, octane levels), how they drive (hard, slow, highway, city), and how often they drive.
Isn't that the measure of a design defect: when it can happen to anyone? How does the fact that it's rare make it not a design defect?
That might be another interesting poll. What Octane rating is being used by those with the problems. I'd also be curious as whether or not anyone had issues with a 3.6 that was mainly driving at high altitudes, i.e. Denver, or is this an issue mostly for people at sea level.
#660
it s a crock is what it is.
Everytime they dont wanna admit its their fault they say "It's bad gas"
I for one get gas at many different places hardly ever the same place and use Reg unleaded.
I bought mine because I planned to drive from East Coast to West and back again thats roughly 5,000 miles so what happens when I get the code in Nebraska.... I mean I bought a brand new car just for this now I might as well set out in a 76 PAcer with my fingers crossed and I would feel just as secure as taking my brand new car.
OUTRAGEOUS!
Everytime they dont wanna admit its their fault they say "It's bad gas"
I for one get gas at many different places hardly ever the same place and use Reg unleaded.
I bought mine because I planned to drive from East Coast to West and back again thats roughly 5,000 miles so what happens when I get the code in Nebraska.... I mean I bought a brand new car just for this now I might as well set out in a 76 PAcer with my fingers crossed and I would feel just as secure as taking my brand new car.
OUTRAGEOUS!