Confused! JK Wrangler GT?
#21
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Laurel Highlands,Pa.
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back in the 70's I bought a new Chevy Vega off the dealer's lot. Somehow it left the factory with a Camaro air cleaner! Needless to say I was outrunning all the Pintos!
#22
Super Moderator
Has a video been posted yet? And wouldn't it be the R/T, GT is Ford.
#25
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not only would it not pull the wheels off the ground at 340 hp it wouldn't do it at 440 hp and as to beating up mustangs and challangers your talking lighter cars with more hp and a lot better aerodynamics. Even a 6 cyl challenger or mustang would proably run with an ls or hemi powered jk. Nope unless the factory screwed up and put a srt hemi in there along with that computer your blowing hot air.
"Pull the wheels off the ground" with a CLAIMED (bullshit) 340 HP? Either a troll, or someone that's far too old and gullible that sits around car shows with those "kids in time out" props regaling us with tales of passengers not being able to snatch a bill off the dash in their "powerful" 300hp/4500lb hunk of 70's junk
#26
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By the way that 340 crank hp relates to about 260 to the rear wheels. I had a z06 vette with bolt ons that did 430 REAR WHEEL HP ON A DYNO and it would pull the front tires even with drag radials.