Supercharged penstar
#2
JK Freak
All this time i have been thinking " man i need to get my 09 jeep upgraded to a 12 so that i have a more powerful jeep and can stop complaining about lack of horsepower" and then u come along and shatter that feeling that the 12 will solve my problems by saying u need a supercharger---so instead, Hemi upgrade here i come! Lol i wish i was joking.....
#3
JK Freak
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N. Prov. , RI
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Texas Trailmaker
All this time i have been thinking " man i need to get my 09 jeep upgraded to a 12 so that i have a more powerful jeep and can stop complaining about lack of horsepower" and then u come along and shatter that feeling that the 12 will solve my problems by saying u need a supercharger---so instead, Hemi upgrade here i come! Lol i wish i was joking.....
#4
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Posts: 11,043
Likes: 0
Received 83 Likes
on
75 Posts
Originally Posted by EarlyJk
Did you really think a smaller displacement 3.6 was the answer? It was Crapslers way of rushing an engine change without having to do much thinking.
#5
JK Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have personally seen videos of '12 JKs running 0-60 in 6.8 seconds. Ten years ago that was sports car territory.
I don't think the 3.6 was "rushed" to market. It was carefully thought out, and they decided it would be a great multi-platform engine that would save them money. I wish it was tuned for more torque in Ram and Jeep applications, but it is a step in the right direction for sure. Most Hemi JKs are barely beating the '12 V6s in drag races...and I mean just barely.
I don't think the 3.6 was "rushed" to market. It was carefully thought out, and they decided it would be a great multi-platform engine that would save them money. I wish it was tuned for more torque in Ram and Jeep applications, but it is a step in the right direction for sure. Most Hemi JKs are barely beating the '12 V6s in drag races...and I mean just barely.
#6
JK Freak
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N. Prov. , RI
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WXman
I have personally seen videos of '12 JKs running 0-60 in 6.8 seconds. Ten years ago that was sports car territory.
I don't think the 3.6 was "rushed" to market. It was carefully thought out, and they decided it would be a great multi-platform engine that would save them money. I wish it was tuned for more torque in Ram and Jeep applications, but it is a step in the right direction for sure. Most Hemi JKs are barely beating the '12 V6s in drag races...and I mean just barely.
I don't think the 3.6 was "rushed" to market. It was carefully thought out, and they decided it would be a great multi-platform engine that would save them money. I wish it was tuned for more torque in Ram and Jeep applications, but it is a step in the right direction for sure. Most Hemi JKs are barely beating the '12 V6s in drag races...and I mean just barely.
#7
JK-Forum Founder
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
i don't know, i love the power the 3.6L pentastar has. certainly, way more than what you got with the old 3.8L and, i have no doubts that in the near future, there will be upgrades you can make to have it modified to being what the challengers come with now. i would imagine that would be a more affordable way to go, easier to install, have no issues with the computer, would provide 305 HP and would be all mopar.
Trending Topics
#8
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Greenbrier, TN
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just want a little more low end grunt and I'd be totally happy with my 12. It has plenty of get up and go (even with 35's and 3.73s) when you get the rpms up but more torque is really what it is lacking.
#9
JK Super Freak
I think the HP and with VVT, the torque that they are getting from the 3.6 is pretty decent. Hopefully, there will not be the quality control problems some have had with oil burning, etc with the 3.8. Time will tell.
Maybe the original 340 HP hemi. Otherwise...heh, okay.
Not that I have a desire to drag race a 2012 JK. I do not.
There are other advantages besides speed for having more cubic inch displacement in a heavy vehicle.
But it sure seems like the 3.6 is a major improvement over the 3.8.
Not that I have a desire to drag race a 2012 JK. I do not.
There are other advantages besides speed for having more cubic inch displacement in a heavy vehicle.
But it sure seems like the 3.6 is a major improvement over the 3.8.
Last edited by Yankee; 11-29-2011 at 07:32 AM.
#10
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: artesia, nm
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sent from my iPhone