Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

so where is the hp?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-02-2016, 04:25 AM
  #1  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
lloydsmale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default so where is the hp?

jeep claims 285. my old Silverado std cab short box had the same both with 373s and the truck would run circles around this jeep. Same goes for the 310 hp club cab 2006 I had with 343s and the newest one. An 15 with 360 and 343s. I can see the newer one but to be honest it is the slowest of the 3. I would think that any one of them are heavier then the jeep. All three were 4x4s pretty much loaded. Are these 3.6 motors a bit over rated. Don't get me wrong. Its not a slug but I would expect a bit more seat of the pants.
Old 11-02-2016, 04:40 AM
  #2  
JK Junkie
 
sa29560's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: - - Jeep-topia - -
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sounds like you need an LS swap. Or a blower.

Maybe try regearing as well, could give back a little more o what you are missing.
Old 11-02-2016, 05:35 AM
  #3  
JK Enthusiast
 
Da20captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I was not in awe after a drive in a stock 3.6 either.
Old 11-02-2016, 06:17 AM
  #4  
JK Enthusiast
 
drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Atlantic Beach, FL
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Grunt

The 3.6 doesn't make low end torque like those V8s.
Old 11-02-2016, 06:55 AM
  #5  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
lloydsmale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you probably hit on something there. Could be the difference in torque not hp. Hp is really just a number. Torque is what moves you. But the jeep doesn't pull like the v8s on the top end either. If seat of the pants meant anything id say the 285 hp 3.6 is closer to 240 crank hp. Anyone ever dyno one and see what it actually put out. those V8s. Don't get me wrong. Like I said I'm not complaining. The jeep this one replaced was a 4cly tj and there should be a picture of one in the dictionary next to the word lame!![/
Originally Posted by drew
The 3.6 doesn't make low end torque like those V8s.

Last edited by lloydsmale; 11-02-2016 at 06:59 AM.
Old 11-02-2016, 07:04 AM
  #6  
JK Freak
 
Ajkaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Anaheim, ca
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Its all about torque and what RPM range your making that torque. Though differential gearing is the same, transmission gearing is likely different. My Jeep isn't winning any races, but it doesn't bother me a bit.
Old 11-02-2016, 07:27 AM
  #7  
JK Enthusiast
 
Smudgeontheglass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Funny how perceptions of power and speed have changed over the last 10-15 years. The JK with a 3.6L can make it to 60mph in 6.6 seconds (8.1 in a loaded JKU) and that is monstrous compared the 11-12 sec 3.8L. A mid nineties sports car would lose to a stock JK in that race.

The JK is rather fast before throwing big tires and armor on it. However, comparing a torquey V8 to a 3.6 with a 6800rpm redline is something else. If you're looking for the HP, you have to drive it like a V6 in the 4500+ rpm range.
Old 11-02-2016, 10:09 AM
  #8  
Super Moderator
 
Rednroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,468
Received 209 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

This seems appropriate right about now.

Old 11-02-2016, 10:19 AM
  #9  
JK Junkie
 
Jonathan_JK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jacksonville NC
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Iv noticed that you have to wind the Jeep up to the redline to actually feel the pull. It feels more like a civic ricer with this engine. If you have a manual you can pre load the RPMs before dropping the clutch for a faster take off. It's what they had to do before most sports cars had launch control.

Either way we are not going to be winning any races. Diesel is where it's at for low end torque.
Old 11-02-2016, 12:28 PM
  #10  
JK Freak

 
doc5339's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 653
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lloydsmale
jeep claims 285. my old Silverado std cab short box had the same both with 373s and the truck would run circles around this jeep. Same goes for the 310 hp club cab 2006 I had with 343s and the newest one. An 15 with 360 and 343s. I can see the newer one but to be honest it is the slowest of the 3. I would think that any one of them are heavier then the jeep. All three were 4x4s pretty much loaded. Are these 3.6 motors a bit over rated. Don't get me wrong. Its not a slug but I would expect a bit more seat of the pants.
Both the torque and horsepower are inadequate for the 3.6 particularly in the Unlimited IMHO, and max torque and power is indeed way too far up in the rev range to be useful.


Quick Reply: so where is the hp?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:08 AM.