Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Rubi 44 vs standard 30 front axle question...

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-13-2011 | 12:04 PM
  #1  
Biginboca's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 3
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default Rubi 44 vs standard 30 front axle question...

Are the axle C's the same for both these axles?

Also, is it less risky to run 35" tires on a Rubi 44 than the standard Dana 30 on other jk's? (If yes can someone tell my why?)
Old 04-13-2011 | 12:07 PM
  #2  
wayoflife's Avatar
JK-Forum Founder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 16
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Biginboca
Are the axle C's the same for both these axles?

Also, is it less risky to run 35" tires on a Rubi 44 than the standard Dana 30 on other jk's? (If yes can someone tell my why?)
yes, they are exactly the same.

yes, running 35's is less risky on a rubi 44 but only because the axle shafts are beefier and the r&p are bigger. but, you'd be okay on a dana 30 too - there are lots of folks running that set up now.
Old 04-13-2011 | 12:07 PM
  #3  
Dynatrac's Avatar
Sponsoring Manufacturer
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 4
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Biginboca
Are the axle C's the same for both these axles?

Also, is it less risky to run 35" tires on a Rubi 44 than the standard Dana 30 on other jk's? (If yes can someone tell my why?)
The Dana 30 'C's are the same as a Rubi 'C'. A Rubi 44 will handle 35" tires better because the ring and pinion are stronger (larger) and are better able to handle the load. The 44 axle shafts also have a larger diameter inner shafts and larger u-joints.
Old 04-13-2011 | 12:09 PM
  #4  
Biginboca's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 3
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default

Wow, you guys are quick. That took all of 3 minutes!

Thank you!
Old 04-13-2011 | 12:11 PM
  #5  
SulVento's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Default

The D44 is "stouter" than the D30, so in that sense, "yes" it is less risky.

HOWEVER. Your driving habits (skinny pedal attitude) have as much or more to say about "risk" than anything.

Lot's of folks run 35's and even 37's on a D30 and do just fine......

Other's run 35's on a D44 and snap things left and right.

Much also depends on your use. Daily driver, never see a trail? Less risk (in theory)

Trail runner? Love rocks and mud? More risk.
Old 04-13-2011 | 04:51 PM
  #6  
jeepmedic's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 1
From: Cashton, WI
Default

Perfectly said. I have run my D30 for 2 years on 35s with 5.13s, open. I have had no issues, but I am smart with the skinny pedal and know my limits.

If you are real aggressive off road, then a D44 would probably be a better choice. You just have to consider the cost issues....

Originally Posted by SulVento
The D44 is "stouter" than the D30, so in that sense, "yes" it is less risky.

HOWEVER. Your driving habits (skinny pedal attitude) have as much or more to say about "risk" than anything.

Lot's of folks run 35's and even 37's on a D30 and do just fine......

Other's run 35's on a D44 and snap things left and right.

Much also depends on your use. Daily driver, never see a trail? Less risk (in theory)

Trail runner? Love rocks and mud? More risk.




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:25 AM.