Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

regear -or- tuner??

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-29-2012 | 11:29 AM
  #41  
MrDillClinton's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by frick316
So I'm guessing most guys go with regent?
If you have a 2007-2011 JK, especially with an AUTO trans, regearing will be very crucial to drive-ability and off-road performance with larger tires.

If you have a 2012, it MIGHT be, but make sure when you are researching on this forum you pay close attention. Most posts on the forum, including several in this thread, are concerning JKs with the 3.8 engine/tranny combo. With the 2012 models, traditional JK wisdom will not always apply. I posted the gear/tire size charts a few posts back, and they are also available in the FAQ and a thread by Jpop. Some members have already over-geared with 4.88 or 5.13 gears for 35" tires and posted warnings about it. Many are hoping for a 4.30 gear set for the Dana axles to start being produced, which would be a really good gear set for 35's. 4.30's have been a popular gear set for non-jeep vehicles in the past.

Last edited by MrDillClinton; 03-29-2012 at 12:02 PM.
Old 03-29-2012 | 12:09 PM
  #42  
Wads13's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

My from my personal experience, I am no expert on gearing by any means:

I have an '09 4dr w/ 3.73's and auto trans, within the first month I lifted with 2.5" coil spacer and put 33's on it (285/75R16) on 16x8 steel wheel; then proceeded to take a 1300 mile road trip. The Jeep did pretty well but had a little trouble passing with a head wind at 75+ mph, I was expecting this so not a huge issue for me personally (shoot it's a Jeep, not meant to go fast, meant to perform off-road). I then added a CAI, TBS, and cat back exhaust, which for the "butt in seat" feel it seemed to help, but wanted a little more pep and new I would soon go to 35's, so I now have a SC Flashpaq, which did help for again that "butt in seat" feel (I also like the added options that come with a tuner for correcting speedo, TPMS, etc...). Since then I have upgraded to 35's on alum wheels (which was nice because the actual change in weight from previous setup to new was almost negligible) and with my current setup I have no issues and I am happy so far with performance on road. I will say this though, I do plan to regear in the future to probably 4.88's to alleviate some of the strain on the drive train.

Since you're running 3.21's and new 3.6 Pentistar (although I wasn't completely impressed with the new engine when I test drove one; can see my review here: https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/show...MW3-Pics-here!) I do not have a great answer for you and my story above is simply for comparison only. My friendly advice, if you don't plan to go larger than 33's on a dual purpose rig and do minor wheelin' I would say for financial purposes go with a tuner. If money is no object, I would probably look to regear first, then maybe look into a tuner after that; but then again what do I know.


Last edited by Wads13; 03-29-2012 at 01:19 PM.
Old 03-29-2012 | 12:28 PM
  #43  
MrDillClinton's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by Wads13
My from my personal experience, I am no expert on gearing by any means:

I have an '09 4dr w/ 3.73's, within the first month I lifted with 2.5" coil spacer and put 33's on it (285/75R16) on 16x8 steel wheel; then proceeded to take a 1300 mile road trip. The Jeep did pretty well but had a little trouble passing with a head wind at 75+ mph, I was expecting this so not a huge issue for me personally (shoot it's a Jeep, not meant to go fast, meant to perform off-road). I then added a CAI, TBS, and cat back exhaust, which for the "butt in seat" feel it seemed to help, but wanted a little more pep and new I would soon go to 35's, so I now have a SC Flashpaq, which did help for again that "butt in seat" feel (I also like the added options that come with a tuner for correcting speedo, TPMS, etc...). Since then I have upgraded to 35's on alum wheels (which was nice because the actual change in weight from previous setup to new was almost negligible) and with my current setup I have no issues and I am happy so far with performance on road. I will say this though, I do plan to regear in the future to probably 4.88's to alleviate some of the strain on the drive train.

Since you're running 3.21's and new 3.6 Pentistar (although I wasn't completely impressed with the new engine when I test drove one; can see my review here: https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/show...MW3-Pics-here!) I do not have a great answer for you and my story above is simply for comparison only. My friendly advice, if you don't plan to go larger than 33's on a dual purpose rig and do minor wheelin' I would say for financial purposes go with a tuner. If money is no object, I would probably look to regear first, then maybe look into a tuner after that; but then again what do I know.

You might want to specify whether you drove an auto or a manual. From what you say, I'm guessing you had a manual, with the OD being better for oversized tires.
Old 03-29-2012 | 12:59 PM
  #44  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,045
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by MrDillClinton

I said that "overdrive would be useless" in response to YOUR comment about running 3.21's and 35's. And it would be.

And, just so you will know, the 3.6 pentastar puts out the EXACT same amount of torque at 2000 RPM's as it does at 2500 RPM's.

You're making comments about the 3.8 engine, which aren't necessarily true for the 3.6, and the OP has a 2012. 2000 RPM's is not lugging the motor in a 2012 JK, neither is 1500 RPM's.

If you'll see my post above, you'll notice that with the 3.21's and 33's that the OP was asking about, his 2012 JK is putting out more horsepower than a 3.8L JK would be with 4.11's and 33's.

Edit: here's the figures, since I doubt you guys want to add it up for yourself.

A 3.8L JK Auto with 33's and 4.11 gears is turning 2100 RPM's @ 70 mph and putting out about 205 ft lbs of torque. (205x2100)/5252= 82 HP.

That is less HP than a 2012 Auto with 33's and 3.21's. That is why I'm telling the OP that regearing is not AS necessary for the setup he wants to run - its widely accepted that 4.11's and 33" tires are fine for 2007-2011 JK's. If this is true, then 3.21's and 33's will be even better for the OP's 2012 Auto.
I have never said 35's and 3.21 gears would be a good combination, because it wouldn't. I have simply been making comparisons to show how gearing helps with load on the engine. Your twisting things around yet again. I realize the differences between the 3.6 and 3.8 motor and transmissions and have drove both. As far as the OP, and not going over 33's, although not ideal in my opinion, it will be liveable only because of the improved engine and transmission, and if and when a tuner becomes available for them, it would help even more, especially with advanced transmission tuning
Old 03-29-2012 | 01:18 PM
  #45  
Wads13's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by MrDillClinton
You might want to specify whether you drove an auto or a manual. From what you say, I'm guessing you had a manual, with the OD being better for oversized tires.
Shoot my bad, will update my original post... But to answer I have an auto

Old 03-29-2012 | 01:29 PM
  #46  
MrDillClinton's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan0260
I have never said 35's and 3.21 gears would be a good combination, because it wouldn't. I have simply been making comparisons to show how gearing helps with load on the engine. Your twisting things around yet again. I realize the differences between the 3.6 and 3.8 motor and transmissions and have drove both. As far as the OP, and not going over 33's, although not ideal in my opinion, it will be liveable only because of the improved engine and transmission, and if and when a tuner becomes available for them, it would help even more, especially with advanced transmission tuning
Please explain how I "twisted things around." If you're talking about the 35's and 3.21's, I was "twisting," I think we were just on different trains of thought. I'll lay out the conversation for you, so you realize I had no bad intentions.


Originally Posted by Ryan0260
Most load will be placed on the engine during takeoff and acceleration
Originally Posted by MrDillClinton
The truth is, the 2012 with an auto transmission would be able to turn 35's from a dead stop, and would still have an overall lower gear ratio than I would starting off in 2nd gear with 3.73's and my stock SRA's.
Originally Posted by Ryan0260
I never said a '12 wont turn 35" tires with 3.21 gears, but a '12 with 4.10 gears will turn them easier due to more torque
Originally Posted by MrDillClinton
35's is a different story. OD would be useless because there wouldn't be significant RPM's to provide the power.
At this point, as with all my posts, I am STILL referring to the original thread, which addresses a 2012 Auto with 3.21 gears.

Originally Posted by Ryan0260
How would overdrive be useless?
<--I'm guessing this is where we got mixed up, because it seems like you thought I was talking about 4.10's.

Originally Posted by MrDillClinton
I said that "overdrive would be useless" in response to YOUR comment about running 3.21's and 35's. And it would be.
<--And here is my first attempt at squashing the whole overdrive debate, which we both seemed to agree on.

Originally Posted by Ryan0260
I have never said 35's and 3.21 gears would be a good combination, because it wouldn't. I have simply been making comparisons to show how gearing helps with load on the engine. Your twisting things around yet again.
<--And here's you accusing me of "twisting" things around.

I have done nothing but answer the OP's question, which was originally about strain on the engine, and he also mentioned cost. I think I've been pretty straightforward with YOU and the OP in all my posts, and I have backed them with actual facts that support what I have said.
Old 03-29-2012 | 01:35 PM
  #47  
MrDillClinton's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by Wads13
Shoot my bad, will update my original post... But to answer I have an auto


To the OP, with 3.21's and a 2012 Auto: with 33's, you will have more power than Wads's JK had on 3.73's and 33's.

Of course, 3.21's is not the gear set any of us would pick to go with 33" tires, but after you buy wheels, tires, get them mounted, guy new gears, and have them installed, you probably could've upgraded to a RUBI.
Old 03-29-2012 | 02:01 PM
  #48  
Wads13's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by MrDillClinton
Of course, 3.21's is not the gear set any of us would pick to go with 33" tires, but after you buy wheels, tires, get them mounted, guy new gears, and have them installed, you probably could've upgraded to a RUBI.
Not looking for an argument, I feel this statement is more a matter of opinion than fact, depends on what you go with, how you handle the mod'ing, etc... And depending on the mod'ing that you do, why pay a premium for the Rubi stuff when you're just going to mod that stuff as well.

Old 03-29-2012 | 02:09 PM
  #49  
MrDillClinton's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by Wads13
Not looking for an argument, I feel this statement is more a matter of opinion than fact, depends on what you go with, how you handle the mod'ing, etc... And depending on the mod'ing that you do, why pay a premium for the Rubi stuff when you're just going to mod that stuff as well.

Well you're right. Guess it would all depend on all the costs.
Old 03-29-2012 | 02:24 PM
  #50  
yo_marc's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 1
From: Attleboro, MA
Default

Load on an engine is load... Gearing will not change the load seen at the flywheel. 'That' is all in your right foot.

How that engine torque gets transferred to the tires is where the transmission and gears come into play. Deep gears transfer a lot of torque to the axles. Taller gears, not as much.

Shorter gearing (4.10's on 32's) will not necessarily mean bad mileage or a winded engine. I ran that combo for almost 100k miles. I am a fuel miser, and found my best mileage maintaining 2400rpm in the 3.8L. Lower, and I needed slightly more pedal to make simple grades on the highway.

My opinion - run the deepest gears you can tolerate.

And of course, a tuner will not substitute proper gearing



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 AM.