Pro Comp 1069's or Mickey Thompson Classic II's?
10-19-2008, 05:12 AM
#1
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Iberia, LA
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pro Comp 1069's or Mickey Thompson Classic II's?
I am considering purchasing either a set of M/T or Pro Comp wheels. I can make a really good deal on the Pro Comps. I have noticed that most of the Pro Comps are made in China. This is true also for my stock JK wheels that have Made in China stamped on them. I'm not sure where the M/T wheels are made. Will try to find out. Would like a little input on the subject? Which would you buy?
10-19-2008, 06:22 AM
#2
JK-Forum Founder
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
so far as i know, most wheels are made in china or at least start from there and get finished here. either way, both have a similar look but another thing you should take into consideration is what wheel size they are available in and back spacing. IIRC, the MC's are not or at least, were not available in 17's or maybe it was that they weren't available in the right bolt pattern - i'm not sure. maybe things have changed since i last looked.
10-19-2008, 06:27 AM
#3
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Iberia, LA
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so far as i know, most wheels are made in china or at least start from there and get finished here. either way, both have a similar look but another thing you should take into consideration is what wheel size they are available in and back spacing. IIRC, the MC's are not or at least, were not available in 17's or maybe it was that they weren't available in the right bolt pattern - i'm not sure. maybe things have changed since i last looked.
M/T Classic II, 17x9 5x5 bolt pattern, 4.5 backspacing
Pro Comp 1069, 17x9 5x5 bolt pattern, 4.75 backspacing
Just wanted some opinions.
10-19-2008, 06:32 AM
#4
JK Freak
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North AL
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I initially bought the M/T II in 16x8/5x5 bolt pattern but had to exchange them for the ProComps. I haven't heard of anyone else having my problem but the M/T didn't fit flush on the front hubs. The clearance around the calipers was fine, it was the metal piece of the caliper that sticks out beyond the hub that was hitting the wheel. The back of the M/T wheel had a larger flat area than the ProComps. I have a 2007, don't know if the 2008 has this problem.
06-04-2010, 08:34 PM
#7
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just curious - i'm still searching around the forum for these answers but i thought i'd just ask here - what are the advantages of having a 17" wheel over a 16" wheel? advantages of 16" over 17", etc?? i definitely won't be going with 15's but i'm a bit torn between the 16" and 17"... tires are sure cheaper for the 16's!!
also, i was trying to find data on the weight of the wheel (procomp 1069 or 1079 17x9 and 16x8), as well as the weight of my stock rubicon 17x7.5"... i was just curious what the overall weight of each wheel/tire would be when comparing stock vs. the procomp setup (with BFG KM/2 35x12.5x17's...)
i've looked on the pro comp website and can't find the weight of their wheels anywhere (maybe i'm blind)??
Trending Topics
06-07-2010, 01:16 PM
#8
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the 1069's in 16X8 with my M/T Baja Claws, no issues on fitment, and they hold the bead really well, ive had them as low as 10 PSI on the rocks and no issues.
06-07-2010, 03:26 PM
#9
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the input! They look great! I'm pretty sure that's what I'll ultimately go with (in about 6 weeks)...