Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Preliminary 2012 Pentastar Gear Chart (beta)

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-23-2012 | 12:55 AM
  #31  
Happybg81's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Default

I have put 33's on my 2012 auto JKU. According to my window sticker I have 3:21, but at 70 mph I am running 2150 rpm. Now I am starting to wonder if that's what I have or not.
Old 03-08-2012 | 07:41 AM
  #32  
B 1000's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach CA
Default

So I hate to be "that guy" who asks about best MPG for a Jeep, but...

Are people seeing better MPG gains with lower ratios (such as 4.56 vs. 3.73 on 35" tires) or is the higher RPM range hurting MPG? It seemed like my older JKU with the 3.8 litre got better mileage with 5.13s than it did with 3.73s for 35" tires, but I attributed that to lack of TQ and HP. So I guess my question is this; Since the 2012 has more HP and TQ, is it best to keep this motor in the lower RPMs, or is it best to get a little higher in the RPM range and make it easier on the motor to yield better MPG?
Old 03-08-2012 | 07:50 AM
  #33  
rays0852's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, FL
Default

Originally Posted by B 1000
So I hate to be "that guy" who asks about best MPG for a Jeep, but...

Are people seeing better MPG gains with lower ratios (such as 4.56 vs. 3.73 on 35" tires) or is the higher RPM range hurting MPG? It seemed like my older JKU with the 3.8 litre got better mileage with 5.13s than it did with 3.73s for 35" tires, but I attributed that to lack of TQ and HP. So I guess my question is this; Since the 2012 has more HP and TQ, is it best to keep this motor in the lower RPMs, or is it best to get a little higher in the RPM range and make it easier on the motor to yield better MPG?
I would not see a need to go above 4.56s in a 2012.

I'm no expert on this as this is my 1st Jeep, but 4.10s to 4.56s seem to be perfect for 35s-37s.

I have 3.21s running factory tires and I just don't see how making a small bump to 4.10s with bigger tires will make that much difference in MPG. I think the drag created by a wider tire and the tread pattern (rolling resistance) would be more of a factor than gearing higher while adding circumference to the tire (almost a wash?).
Old 03-08-2012 | 08:04 AM
  #34  
Hutch434's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, Va.
Default

Originally Posted by B 1000
So I hate to be "that guy" who asks about best MPG for a Jeep, but...

Are people seeing better MPG gains with lower ratios (such as 4.56 vs. 3.73 on 35" tires) or is the higher RPM range hurting MPG? It seemed like my older JKU with the 3.8 litre got better mileage with 5.13s than it did with 3.73s for 35" tires, but I attributed that to lack of TQ and HP. So I guess my question is this; Since the 2012 has more HP and TQ, is it best to keep this motor in the lower RPMs, or is it best to get a little higher in the RPM range and make it easier on the motor to yield better MPG?

Auto Comparo~
I put about 60 miles a day on my 2012 JKU(3.73/stock tires). Driving rolling curvy back roads, using the "Eco On" as much as possible I can stay over 20mpg. The 3.6L lugs up hills without downshifting and having an extra gear and torque keeps it in the sweet spot better. With the 4 speed auto it has to step further out of the sweet spot to maintain speed. Regearing the axles based on these charts keeps you in the optimal MPG range for the 3.8L Auto. Higher RPM under less load can yield better MPG than lower RPMs under load. A vacuum gauge will tell you the same story.
Old 03-08-2012 | 09:45 AM
  #35  
rays0852's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Hutch434
Auto Comparo~
I put about 60 miles a day on my 2012 JKU(3.73/stock tires). Driving rolling curvy back roads, using the "Eco On" as much as possible I can stay over 20mpg. The 3.6L lugs up hills without downshifting and having an extra gear and torque keeps it in the sweet spot better. With the 4 speed auto it has to step further out of the sweet spot to maintain speed. Regearing the axles based on these charts keeps you in the optimal MPG range for the 3.8L Auto. Higher RPM under less load can yield better MPG than lower RPMs under load. A vacuum gauge will tell you the same story.
wth is "Eco On" ?

Am I missing a button in my 2012?
Old 03-08-2012 | 01:43 PM
  #36  
Happybg81's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Default

Originally Posted by rays0852

wth is "Eco On" ?

Am I missing a button in my 2012?
As near as I can tell it's not something up you can toggle on and off. It just tells you whether your driving economically or not.
Old 03-09-2012 | 03:48 AM
  #37  
enwhypetey's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, NY
Default

Originally Posted by rays0852

wth is "Eco On" ?

Am I missing a button in my 2012?
It's telling you you are driving the most economical way at the moment...you can turn it off in the personal settings section in the dash
Old 03-09-2012 | 04:23 AM
  #38  
flatattack's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Fernandina Beach, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Happybg81
I have put 33's on my 2012 auto JKU. According to my window sticker I have 3:21, but at 70 mph I am running 2150 rpm. Now I am starting to wonder if that's what I have or not.
Sounds about right, exactly what I'm turning.
Old 03-09-2012 | 05:24 AM
  #39  
Colorblindspy's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Little elm, Texas
Default

Note, it will only allow you to access personal settings when you are in park.
Old 03-09-2012 | 07:53 AM
  #40  
inkster's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Default

Originally Posted by HornetJK
Im running 35's with stock 4.10s on my 2012 and it runs great. The gas mileage could be a bit better. Im getting a consistent 14 mpg.

what was your mpg at before ?

im going to be doing 35's soon on the same (4:10's on a 2012). ill try an get an accurate before and after, fwiw.


Quick Reply: Preliminary 2012 Pentastar Gear Chart (beta)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:18 AM.