Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

one more engine swap question

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-13-2009, 11:52 AM
  #1  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
rocknredrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default one more engine swap question

It appears that it is no easier (possibly harder) to swap in the 4.7 than a hemi. Both swaps are expensive. This appears to be due to the fact that neither engine shares anything with the stock 3.8 - you need a new tranny/radiator/exhaust/etc in addition to the new engine.

So, are there any engines that are more swap friendly with the 3.8?
Old 02-13-2009, 12:04 PM
  #2  
JK Enthusiast
 
def9112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fort Mill, SC
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 5.7 L or the 6.1 L Hemi

Kits, parts, information,......... its all available
Old 02-13-2009, 12:08 PM
  #3  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
rocknredrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am looking for something less invasive (and expensive) than a hemi.
How about this: A non-3.8 engine swap that will bolt to the 42RLE tranny. Is there such a thing?

Last edited by rocknredrubi; 02-13-2009 at 12:14 PM.
Old 02-13-2009, 12:16 PM
  #4  
JK Enthusiast
 
Thantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not that would be cost effective.
Old 02-13-2009, 03:06 PM
  #5  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
rocknredrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thantos
Not that would be cost effective.
What engine(s) would that be?
Old 02-13-2009, 05:30 PM
  #6  
JK Jedi
 
RedneckJeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 7,213
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I don't think there's another engine that shares the same bell housing pattern as the 3.8. The 42RLE came in several different bell housing patterns to allow for different engines, as well as front wheel drive applications, so saying "A non-3.8 engine swap that will bolt to the 42RLE tranny" is really a moot point. Now, I'm not 100% certain no other engine has the same bell housing pattern.....but I'm 99.9% sure. It would have to be another 60 degree V6, which leaves the 3.5, 3.3 and 3.0....which would all be a step down from the 3.8. I don't think you want to go down. I also don't understand what you mean by "invasive". The HEMI swap is a bolt in swap with one exception. The factory motor mount brackets have to be removed from the frame and HEMI mount brackets installed. Once that's done, it's simply a matter of bolting everything back together. To me, "Invasive" would equate to cutting fenderwells and or firewalls and possibly notching frame rails for exhaust clearance and modifying or replacing the transmission tunnel. NONE of that is required with the HEMI swap. It's almost as if it should have been a factory option.....because it should have been.
Old 02-13-2009, 11:34 PM
  #7  
JK Newbie
 
yellowjkCRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nsw
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just get the supercharger kit
Old 02-14-2009, 05:37 AM
  #8  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
rocknredrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yellowjkCRD
just get the supercharger kit
In general, I prefer a bigger engine to forced induction. But the $$$ just aint there for a hemi. So if more horses are in my future, I may not have a choice.
Old 02-14-2009, 06:34 AM
  #9  
Sponsoring Vendor
 
Screamin Lizard Customs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bedford, Texas
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Horsepower from the 5.7 and 6.1 are the relly used on the road and not off road. The added power is great as a daily driver.



GERRY
Old 02-15-2009, 12:16 PM
  #10  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
rocknredrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Screamin Lizard Customs
Horsepower from the 5.7 and 6.1 are the relly used on the road and not off road. The added power is great as a daily driver.
GERRY
Not sure I understand what you mean. Are you saying you dont recommend the swap if the JK used extensively off road? Or you just get most of the advantage on road? Something else?


Quick Reply: one more engine swap question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.