Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

New gears = Broken axles?????

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-30-2008, 12:06 AM
  #1  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
style_front's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: hawaii
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default New gears = Broken axles?????

How many of you have broken axles after you installed your 4.88's and/or 5.13's? I keep hearing that there is a risk but with so many profiles saying they have 5.13's in their profiles I haven't seen much info on broken axles. Is this a thing of older jeep models that has fixed from the factory?



By next year I'd like to run 37 inch tires and 5.13's however enough talk of broken axles has me a little gun shy to pull the trigger on that setup. The more info the merrier!
Old 04-30-2008, 05:55 AM
  #2  
JK Super Freak
 
TEEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Talking

Do you mean blown diffs, or axles?



Generally, the higher the numerical ratio, the less metal is avail for gear teeth, etc, as there are more of them, etc.



In some cases, the point of diminishing return is reached when the new gears are too delicate for durability.

5.13's are probably not too delicate, if that helps.



(Also - people who spend $ on gears, etc...tend to be more hardcore, and, tend to wheel harder, as a tendancy not a rule, than people who don't....and, therefore, are part of a group who tend to have more failures, of EVERYTHING, as they are pushing the envelope harder than others are...so a break might not have to do with the mod itself, as much as who DOES the mod, etc.)
Old 04-30-2008, 03:16 PM
  #3  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
style_front's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: hawaii
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry, blown differentials is what I meant. Is one gear maker better than another? Manufacturing process, or materials, etc..... What exactly is the deciding factor in what makes a gear too "delicate"?


Old 04-30-2008, 03:43 PM
  #4  
JK Super Freak
 
TEEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Talking

As mentioned in the post above yours...what makes the higher/deeper ratios more delicate is that you need more teeth to get that ratio.

If one gear is meshing with another one....its the teeth that mesh....and, the torque multiplication or reduction, etc....is based upon the comparitive number of teeth in the one driving the other.

If you looked at your 10 speed bike (Or whatever they use now a days...) and how 10th gear was the biggest drive gear (By the pedals) driving the smallest gear in back, on the rear tire.

That's because one rotation of the big gear would produce MANY rotations of the smaller gear....so you go FASTER on your bike.


And, if you wanted more power to get up that steep hill, you put it into 1st gear, the smaller drive wheel by the pedals, driving the LARGEST wheel on the rear gears.

Same w/o the chain...which, is REALLY just a floppy gear, as each link is just like a gear tooth as far as meshing goes.



So - to get a 5.13 gear, we need more teeth than on a 3.21 gear, because we need it to muiltiply torque, allow more power, more like 1st gear on your bike, etc.

In a gear set, in a diff, we cannot make the gear bigger around, we need to make it take more of the drive gear's rotations for each of its OWN rotations....by making it with more teeth...for the SAME DIAMETER.

OK, we always have a 360 degree trip around a gear like that....and, we can have pretty much any number of teeth....so, to illustrate the concept of deep and delicate gears...

Imagine a gear with one tooth for every degree of its circumference, 360 teeth.

Now imagine one with 4 teeth, at say 90 degree positions.

OK - I have to MAKE that now....

Lets say each degree of circumference is an inch...my 360 tooth gear is 360 inches in circumference, and every tooth has a one inch base.

Now lets look at my 4 tooth version....each tooth has 1/4 of the circumference as its base, or 90 inches per base...WAAAAAAY thicker per tooth than the one with 360 teeth.



Make sense yet?



The more teeth, the smaller they have to be to fit....and, the smaller the tooth, the easier it is to snap one off.



__________________________________________________ ___________


And, sure, the metallurgy involved with gears is very quality dependent....cheaper gears using less durable metals, and high quality gears, that may have exotic alloys, or have been cryogenically treated, etc....cost more.

MOST of the gears we see are actually made by the same companies, and they just private label them....common practice in the industry.

So, some gears are not as good as others.

Old 04-30-2008, 04:28 PM
  #5  
JK Jedi Master
 
ronjenx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 12,880
Likes: 0
Received 170 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TEEJ
As mentioned in the post above yours...what makes the higher/deeper ratios more delicate is that you need more teeth to get that ratio.

If one gear is meshing with another one....its the teeth that mesh....and, the torque multiplication or reduction, etc....is based upon the comparitive number of teeth in the one driving the other.

If you looked at your 10 speed bike (Or whatever they use now a days...) and how 10th gear was the biggest drive gear (By the pedals) driving the smallest gear in back, on the rear tire.

That's because one rotation of the big gear would produce MANY rotations of the smaller gear....so you go FASTER on your bike.


And, if you wanted more power to get up that steep hill, you put it into 1st gear, the smaller drive wheel by the pedals, driving the LARGEST wheel on the rear gears.

Same w/o the chain...which, is REALLY just a floppy gear, as each link is just like a gear tooth as far as meshing goes.



So - to get a 5.13 gear, we need more teeth than on a 3.21 gear, because we need it to muiltiply torque, allow more power, more like 1st gear on your bike, etc.

In a gear set, in a diff, we cannot make the gear bigger around, we need to make it take more of the drive gear's rotations for each of its OWN rotations....by making it with more teeth...for the SAME DIAMETER.
OK, we always have a 360 degree trip around a gear like that....and, we can have pretty much any number of teeth....so, to illustrate the concept of deep and delicate gears...

Imagine a gear with one tooth for every degree of its circumference, 360 teeth.

Now imagine one with 4 teeth, at say 90 degree positions.

OK - I have to MAKE that now....

Lets say each degree of circumference is an inch...my 360 tooth gear is 360 inches in circumference, and every tooth has a one inch base.

Now lets look at my 4 tooth version....each tooth has 1/4 of the circumference as its base, or 90 inches per base...WAAAAAAY thicker per tooth than the one with 360 teeth.



Make sense yet?



The more teeth, the smaller they have to be to fit....and, the smaller the tooth, the easier it is to snap one off.



__________________________________________________ ___________


And, sure, the metallurgy involved with gears is very quality dependent....cheaper gears using less durable metals, and high quality gears, that may have exotic alloys, or have been cryogenically treated, etc....cost more.

MOST of the gears we see are actually made by the same companies, and they just private label them....common practice in the industry.

So, some gears are not as good as others.

I just read your post, above. It looks like you are saying the diameters on the ring and pinion do not figure into the ratio. This cannot be true. Remember, the gear teeth on the ring gear have to be the same size (pitch, etc.) as those on the pinion. In order to change the number of teeth on one without changing the number of teeth on the other (to change the ratio), the diameter has to change. In other words, if the difference in diameters between the ring and pinion stays the same, the ratio of teeth between the two will ramain the same. You can add teeth on the ring gear, but if you don't make it bigger around, the teeth must be smaller. In which case, the teeth on the pinion would have to be smaller, too, keeping the ratio of teeth the same.
Counting teeth on the gears is only a convenieant way to measure the circumference. The pitch is the same on both meshing gears. It is the ratio of the circumferences which gives you a different gear ratio.

Last edited by ronjenx; 04-30-2008 at 05:30 PM.
Old 04-30-2008, 04:30 PM
  #6  
JK Freak
 
brent_f70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow...I agree with what he said...But look at the teeth in this pic. My Jeep has 5.13 and they appear pretty thick!! I checked them for wear after 5000 miles and put on new diff covers. I think it was a great mod and I would not have my JK with 35's any other way!!


NEW ARMOR TO KEEP THEM EVEN SAFER!!!



Quick Reply: New gears = Broken axles?????



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:45 PM.