Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Metalcloak Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-01-2013, 09:01 PM
  #441  
JK Freak

 
Nibsirb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 503
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The ones supplied were all the same length. For the back they were perfect fit. For the front they are just waaaaay too long. Prolly perfect for the 3.5 kit, but had to use the stock rear links for the front which were perfect.

Sent from my iPhone using JK-Forum
Old 12-02-2013, 03:18 AM
  #442  
JK Freak
 
n3tfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 645
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Wightmn
We did a 2.5 on my jk on Friday. Wasn't bad at all. Just take your time and preferably have somebody with lift experience. Brad and I helped but Jay and Brian with Stomper Offroad were the pros. A lift and air tools made all the difference. It rides and handles AWESOME. MetalCloak has designed a very complete system that works exactly as advertised.

I originally ordered the 3.5, but was shipped 2.5 springs. Stomper is going swap them out for the 3.5"s.

For those who have done the Game Changer Lite 3.5, what was your net lift in front and back?

Here is before and after.

Thanks,
Ted
Very nice! Looking forward to the 2.5 to 3.5 pic difference. That'll be my deciding point
Old 12-02-2013, 03:26 AM
  #443  
JK Enthusiast
 
BigMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cgflyer
the supplied sway bar links are not the right length?
They supply Sway Bar blocks for the rear. It moves the entire track bar mount down about 4".
Old 12-02-2013, 11:53 AM
  #444  
JK Newbie
 
Wightmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Links

I'm confused.

We used the stock rears in the rear and the supplied set in the front. Kit only came with one set of links. When installed on the 2.5" spring kit the arms are up just slightly.

Hmmm?
Old 12-02-2013, 12:05 PM
  #445  
JK Enthusiast
 
Cgflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Clawson, MI
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wightmn
I'm confused. We used the stock rears in the rear and the supplied set in the front. Kit only came with one set of links. When installed on the 2.5" spring kit the arms are up just slightly. Hmmm?
This is what I thought was the correct install as well. Have you all actually contacted MC with your questions or are you just making up your own fixes as you go?
Old 12-02-2013, 01:09 PM
  #446  
JK Newbie
 
Wightmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cgflyer
This is what I thought was the correct install as well. Have you all actually contacted MC with your questions or are you just making up your own fixes as you go?
A little of both. I got info from MC today.

We installed the stock rear sway links but the kit included trapezoidal spacers that lower the sway bar. That spacer is intended to be used with wheels with more than 5.5" of BS. Not sure if there is any issue running that spacer, stock links and 4.7 BS wheels.
Old 12-02-2013, 01:50 PM
  #447  
JK Enthusiast
 
rodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

when I spoke with Will at MC regarding the front sway bar being slightly angled up, he said the new end links are installed correctly and it was behaving as designed. I have new end links front and rear for my 2.5" kit. I also have wheels with 4.75 BS.
Old 12-02-2013, 01:54 PM
  #448  
JK Jedi
 
Maertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

weird.. most use the rear in the front and provide new rears. Dropping the rear sway bar down seems weird to me...
Old 12-02-2013, 03:00 PM
  #449  
JK Enthusiast
 
BigMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

for the 2.5" lift, putting 12.5" links up front is too much up angle. Sway bars are designed to be parallel or 5* above parallel to the ground. Put the rears up front and use the 12.5" links in the back.
Old 12-02-2013, 03:31 PM
  #450  
JK Jedi
 
Maertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigMike
for the 2.5" lift, putting 12.5" links up front is too much up angle. Sway bars are designed to be parallel or 5* above parallel to the ground. Put the rears up front and use the 12.5" links in the back.
exactly. putting the rears up front and using the provided in rear makes more sense.


Quick Reply: Metalcloak Thread



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:27 AM.