I Regret the 2.5" Rough Country
#21
JK Freak
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm saying that there is less tire sidewall on a 35" tire mounted on a 20" wheel, comparing to the same size tire mounted on a smaller wheel, say 15" or 16". Since the bigger wheel will require a tire with less sidewall, it will make the ride rougher than a tire mounted on a smaller wheel. The tire itself acts as a shock absorber, and aids in softening the ride.
#23
JK Super Freak
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wildomar ca
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm saying that there is less tire sidewall on a 35" tire mounted on a 20" wheel, comparing to the same size tire mounted on a smaller wheel, say 15" or 16". Since the bigger wheel will require a tire with less sidewall, it will make the ride rougher than a tire mounted on a smaller wheel. The tire itself acts as a shock absorber, and aids in softening the ride.
35 on a 20 is = to 31 on a 17
37 on a 20 is = to 33 on a 17
All you thought about was tire size I was talking about how much side wall there is
If the op said he had 31 on 17 what would you have said then
#24
JK Freak
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know what you are trying to say but you are thinking of it wrong you are trying to compare a 35 on a 20 to 35 on 17 you can't do that because there is 2 different size wheels
35 on a 20 is = to 31 on a 17
37 on a 20 is = to 33 on a 17
All you thought about was tire size I was talking about how much side wall there is
If the op said he had 31 on 17 what would you have said then
35 on a 20 is = to 31 on a 17
37 on a 20 is = to 33 on a 17
All you thought about was tire size I was talking about how much side wall there is
If the op said he had 31 on 17 what would you have said then
I never knew simple logic was so hard to understand
#25
JK Enthusiast
someone correct me if i'm wrong, but I think the 2.2 are the older shocks (much stiffer from what I've read around). the newer shocks have a designation of N2.0. as seen on the series II lifts.
#27
JK Enthusiast
I have the same issue... shocks are the most probable cause. I have the same kit on an unlimited running 315/70/17 D rated tires at 28 psi and still drives like crap. As someone mentioned earlier, get a set of Bilsteins and your spine may thank you for it
#28
JK Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: West Greenwich, RI
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I run the 2.5 coil kit with their shocks and have no complaints. With 35's on 15" rims, ride quality on my '12 JKU is the same as it was off the dealer's lot.
As others have said, the stiffer sidewall on your tires may be the root of the cause.
Bilsteins have solved ride quality issues for me in the past, but for now I am completely content with my RC kit.
Bottom line is, if you want a cushy ride, buy a Cadillac
As others have said, the stiffer sidewall on your tires may be the root of the cause.
Bilsteins have solved ride quality issues for me in the past, but for now I am completely content with my RC kit.
Bottom line is, if you want a cushy ride, buy a Cadillac
#30
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I run the 2.5 coil kit with their shocks and have no complaints. With 35's on 15" rims, ride quality on my '12 JKU is the same as it was off the dealer's lot.
As others have said, the stiffer sidewall on your tires may be the root of the cause.
Bilsteins have solved ride quality issues for me in the past, but for now I am completely content with my RC kit.
Bottom line is, if you want a cushy ride, buy a Cadillac
As others have said, the stiffer sidewall on your tires may be the root of the cause.
Bilsteins have solved ride quality issues for me in the past, but for now I am completely content with my RC kit.
Bottom line is, if you want a cushy ride, buy a Cadillac
I expect more for my money