Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

how much mpg can you really lose or gain because of unspung weight?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-06-2011, 03:06 PM
  #21  
JK Super Freak
 
Freewill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 09SDunlimited
Going from the stock pizza cutters which im not sure what the weigh maybe 50ish lbs 225/75r16 to my 285/75r16 which are 76ish i went from 21-22mpg to 17-19 mpg. Now when i pull my mustang (about 3700lbs with trailer) I get 14-15, and my motorcycle about 1600lbs i get about 16-17 mpg. With my lift on i didn't really notice a mpg difference maybe .5. That is my experience with my 6 speed 3.21 geared unlimited. No one can argue that you won't save mpg by saving weight. It is simple physics to get a wieght to a speed you need x accerlation. That accerlation is going to require some kind of work to be done... fuel = energy so less mass to accelerate less energy needed. The 10 to 1 ratio seems pretty fair is every jeep or truck the same no will your factor be different if you do the math maybe.
Extra weight will cost some MPG, whether it is sprung or unsprung. Unsprung weight will also change the handling, but this thread is about MPG. The MPG penalty for extra weight comes mainly when accelerating. Because the tires must "spin up" during acceleration, the weight penalty may be a little greater if the extra weight is in the tires.

Running at a steady speed, the tire MPG penalty comes from tread design and width. A narrow slick gets the best steady speed MPG. The more open, wide, and aggressive the tread, the more rolling resistance the tire has. Rolling resistance costs fuel as shown here over and over when tires are swapped between "highway" tires and mudders.

Now for a trip into left field: I don't have any data to support this, but I have a theory that louder tires have more rolling resistance. When you can hear a rig coming 3 blocks away, consider how big a sound system it would take to create that sound. How ever many watts the sound system would consume is how many extra watts the engine must produce to keep those tires rolling. Nittro tires claim to have the quietest tire for a given tread design. Does anybody know if Nittros get better MPG?
Old 10-06-2011, 03:12 PM
  #22  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
sam187st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

in one of the posts in the thread some has claimed to have lost only 2.5 mpg with 325 65 r18 nitto's, and that way less than i lost with a bigger tire than i have, so there maybe some truth to this, but that can all change once the tire wear starts kicking in. when my mickey mtz were new, they were very quiet, but now they love screaming!

also if there the mud grapplers i know they are way heavier than mine. i think the 33 mud grapplers are in the 70lbs area, just the tire

Last edited by sam187st; 10-06-2011 at 03:18 PM.
Old 10-06-2011, 04:37 PM
  #23  
JK Newbie
 
WXman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This topic is very interesting to me, and I've studied it with real world testing on a few different 4x4s extensively over the past 5 years.

First of all, let me say that MPGs = money. The average person drives almost 1,500 miles per month these days. Gasoline is currently running around $3.25/gallon. That means that simply going from 18 MPG to 16 MPG is worth $33.75 per month! Just 2 measley miles per gallon is all it takes to really start hitting you in the wallet. If you drop 3 or 4 MPGs from adding heavy tires/wheels, you could be taking a $50 bucks per month hit easily. That's bill-paying cash guys. That's toys for your JK cash. That's taking the wife out to eat cash. You don't want to waste it on gasoline.

With that said, the stock 16" steel wheels weigh 25 lbs. The stock 225/75-16 tires weigh 27 lbs. That's 52 lbs. per corner. I was getting 19 MPGs consistently in mixed city/highway driving with that combo.

Then I simply added 31" tires...and those weighed 37 lbs. So I added 10 lbs. per corner. I dropped to 17.5 MPGs instantly.

Then I added 16" alloys that weigh 20 lbs. each and 33" tires that weigh 55 lbs. so now I'm at 75 lbs. per corner. My mileage is in the 16 MPG range.

I lost 3 MPGs just from my wheel/tire combo alone.

Keep in mind that stock Sahara wheels/tires are tipping the scales at 73 lbs. per corner. So STOCK JKs will all see different MPGs based on how they leave the factory.

With 33" tires, it's a triple-wammy. You're adding weight. You're adding leverage against the drivetrain because of the added diameter. You're adding rolling resistence because of the added width. And, you may be adding rolling resistence because of the more aggressive tread. You're also adding wind drag because of the width outside the fenders. So.... every possible thing you can do to decrease efficiency is being done simply because of your bigger tires.

Sure, they look awesome. But they cost money every time you turn the key. This is why a lot of guys are starting to consider... do I NEED 35s just to hit the trail 6 times a year?

There are tall, skinnies like 255/85-16s which will fit the stock 16" wheels and that may help some. But... by far the best thing you can do is stick with ALLOY wheels in the 15 or 16 inch range. Then wrap them in 32s or 33s that are listed at 50ish lbs. This will keep you in factory specs. in terms of weight...and will get you around on the trail just fine. It's the best compromise to keep your wallet from getting drained.
Old 10-06-2011, 04:41 PM
  #24  
JK Enthusiast
 
f2fast4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sam187st
hell, i wish i could buy a tall skinny tire, but there are none. the tallest skinniest i could find in the us was the toyos, they are 34x11.5 r17 but E rated! i cant stand my d rated I cant imagine riding on those e rated tires.
Surprisingly smooth as glass. I have cast aluminum rims plus those Nitto's only weigh 71 pounds. I cruise 80-85 on the Interstate all day long. I really like this tire/wheel combination. 32 psi all around.
Old 10-06-2011, 05:15 PM
  #25  
JK Enthusiast
 
tlend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: cleveland,tn
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went from sahara wheels and tires to AEV pintlers and nitto terra grapplers in an 285-70-17. I noticed an immediate difference. The best I can get on the highway is about 17.5 with an unlimited auto. Around town is even worse. And that's driving good.
Old 10-06-2011, 05:21 PM
  #26  
JK Super Freak
 
db09JKU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I lost about 2mpg going from the stock SRA's to 285/70-17 Treadwright Wardens. Stock wheels. The SRA's weigh about 36 lbs and the treadrights 65lbs.
Old 10-06-2011, 05:26 PM
  #27  
JK Newbie
 
Otbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kerrville TX
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Went to 265/70/17 Michelins on the stock alloys. No change in mileage.
Old 10-07-2011, 04:39 AM
  #28  
JK Enthusiast
 
reddragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So how much do the stock 17s weigh?
Old 10-07-2011, 05:55 AM
  #29  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
sam187st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f2fast4u
Surprisingly smooth as glass. I have cast aluminum rims plus those Nitto's only weigh 71 pounds. I cruise 80-85 on the Interstate all day long. I really like this tire/wheel combination. 32 psi all around.
only 71 lbs? the i about to pull the trigger on some bfg At in 35x12 r15 the tires are 54 lbs. that alone is 17 lbs difference.



Quick Reply: how much mpg can you really lose or gain because of unspung weight?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 PM.