Gears or transfer case
#11
JK Jedi Master
Don't you already have a Rubicon with 4:1 T-Case?
Here are the ratios you are dealing with:
2.73 X 4.10 = 11.2 --------(Non-Rubi with 4.10 axle)
2.73 X 5.13 = 14 ----------(Non-Rubi with 5.13 axle)
4 X 4.10 = 16.4 ------------(Rubi with 4.10 axle) (This is yours?)
4 X 5.13 = 20.5 ------------(Rubi with 5.13 axle)
Last edited by ronjenx; 08-21-2010 at 04:51 AM.
#12
Changing your R&Ps will lower the ratio all the time and is the best mod hands down after the lift/tires. Many, many threads about that one.
If you run 75 a lot I'd say put in 4.88 and the atlas transfer case would be the best of everything (except for your wallet). I love my 5.13s but I stick to 60 - 65mph so I can average 18mpg.
4.88s will put you back to factory.... 5.13s put a large smile on my face while factory tires and 4.1 did not....that being said at 75mph & 5.13s the RPMs will be to high for good MPG figures, someone else may comment on the fuel mileage at that speed.
#13
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hoodbridge, Va
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
x2 what everyone else has said about doing the transfer case. I have 4.88's with 35's and a manual tranny. I think it works great on rocks btw and I don't have the Rubicon Tranny...which I'm sure would make it even better. I think if you went 5.13's and wanted to hit 75 on the highway you'd really be pushing your motor. I honestly don't like going over 70 too much unless I have to pass someone and it's only for a short while. The RPM's are are pretty high just with 4.88's.
It would be good to hear from someone who has 5.13's who drive on the highway though. Hope this helps...of course you could always do both if you really wanted too
It would be good to hear from someone who has 5.13's who drive on the highway though. Hope this helps...of course you could always do both if you really wanted too
#14
JK Junkie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lakewood, OH
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Solving a final driveline ratio for off road use with rear end gears would be a bad idea. Most people have wants of both better on road and off road performance, but as stated this doesn't seem to be at issue. In the end you can either incrementally upgrade your final driveline ratio for off road use while dramatically improving your on road performance by way of rear end gears or dramatically improve things off road via a replacement transfer case while doing nothing for on road performance.
My advice would be to step back for a moment and figure out what you really want to accomplish.
My advice would be to step back for a moment and figure out what you really want to accomplish.
#16
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hoodbridge, Va
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It will be quicker off the line but that's it. 1st gear will be useless for you. I don't know what your top speed would comfortably be to you though. It'll definitely be less....if you're looking to go 75-80 I'd say forget it. Then again that's something I'd ask around to people who have that particular setup with 5.13's and 6 speed manual seeing how I have the 4.88's and 6 speed..
#17
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hoodbridge, Va
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Solving a final driveline ratio for off road use with rear end gears would be a bad idea. Most people have wants of both better on road and off road performance, but as stated this doesn't seem to be at issue. In the end you can either incrementally upgrade your final driveline ratio for off road use while dramatically improving your on road performance by way of rear end gears or dramatically improve things off road via a replacement transfer case while doing nothing for on road performance.
My advice would be to step back for a moment and figure out what you really want to accomplish.
My advice would be to step back for a moment and figure out what you really want to accomplish.
Good luck with your decision!
#18
JK Freak
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking if you will get a lower ratio by going to 5.13 gears, or going to a 4:1 t-case.
Don't you already have a Rubicon with 4:1 T-Case?
Here are the ratios you are dealing with:
2.73 X 4.10 = 11.2 --------(Non-Rubi with 4.10 axle)
2.73 X 5.13 = 14 ----------(Non-Rubi with 5.13 axle)
4 X 4.10 = 16.4 ------------(Rubi with 4.10 axle) (This is yours?)
4 X 5.13 = 20.5 ------------(Rubi with 5.13 axle)
Don't you already have a Rubicon with 4:1 T-Case?
Here are the ratios you are dealing with:
2.73 X 4.10 = 11.2 --------(Non-Rubi with 4.10 axle)
2.73 X 5.13 = 14 ----------(Non-Rubi with 5.13 axle)
4 X 4.10 = 16.4 ------------(Rubi with 4.10 axle) (This is yours?)
4 X 5.13 = 20.5 ------------(Rubi with 5.13 axle)
btw, if i may interject on this, the ratios will actually be numerically higher than what you have. also figured in is gear ratios of the tranny and tire size
#19
JK Junkie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lakewood, OH
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It'll make you quicker for the first 60 feet and that is where most people will judge their improvements. Not going to be any difference after that, outside of perhaps needing an additional shift to get to 60.
#20
JK Jedi Master
I didn't include transmission gears or tire size because he defined them in his original post, making them constants. That's why I included only the variables. He was looking for the combination that would yield the lowest gear ratio.