Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Definitive steel v alloy v weight

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-24-2012 | 06:35 AM
  #1  
tcam93's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default Definitive steel v alloy v weight

I've been looking at new wheels for my 2010 Sahara Unlimited for some time. Out of all I see, I just like the rugged and simple look of Black Rock Series 942 Type D or the Pro Comp Series 52 ... I currently have the 18 inch stock wheels with 255 70 18. I'm thinking of 16 inchers with 285/75/16. ... The 16 inch wheels with a back spacing of 4.25 or so.

I read on this forum and others about unsprung weight and dramatic loss in gas mileage.. Can anyone offer any insight into these issues? Totally, I'm looking at less than 40lbs additionally weight.
Old 11-24-2012 | 07:57 AM
  #2  
onecrazyfuq's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Alloys will always way less then steel rims. But the question is do you want to achieve your 40 pound mark rims and tires combined because most of your weight is rubber. For example a 35 inch tire can get real heavy
Old 11-24-2012 | 08:22 AM
  #3  
JE8154's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 1
From: Madison, New Jersey
Default

I saved 3 pounds per wheel by going from the stock 16's to procomp 16" alloys... You're not going to save much weight unless you're also stepping down a size in wheels and even then you're just adding more rubber. If you're just trying to save gas look for a load range C/D all terrain. I saw a very minimal loss in gas mileage going to a 305/70/16 duratrac, but when I went from those to a 315/75/16 toyo MT I lost a solid 3mpg. I do have 3.21's in a manual 12 so it's mostly hurting me in stop and go traffic.
Old 11-24-2012 | 08:28 AM
  #4  
tcam93's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by onecrazyfuq
Alloys will always way less then steel rims. But the question is do you want to achieve your 40 pound mark rims and tires combined because most of your weight is rubber. For example a 35 inch tire can get real heavy
My current setup is 32.1 inches and I think the 16x8 with 285/75/16 is right at 33 inches... But, at less than 10lbs additional weight per corner ... Is that really enough to worry about? The overall size change is very minor. I guess my overall concern is that are steel wheels really as bad as folks make them out to be? My stock alloys already have scuffs through the clear coat just from being on our farm and driving through the fields of corn stalks and the like... We've got gravel roads around that have chipped pieces the clear coat.




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:34 AM.