Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Cylinder Head compatability

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-03-2010, 02:54 PM
  #11  
JK Jedi
 
RedneckJeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 7,213
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Here's the thing. Throwin ALL the computer stuff out the window (which you really cannot do), your biggest problem with earlier heads is valvetrain failure. Broken rocker pedestals, broken rocker arms, crapped up pushrods and even some dropped valves plagued those earlier engines. I wouldn't touch the earlier heads with a 10 foot pole. Also, as another poster stated, you'll get nowhere porting heads without at least a better camshaft, which no one makes. Of course, you could pay for a regrind, but then, you have to worry about all that other hot rod stuff like increasing air IN (larger throttle body), increasing fuel flow with bigger injectors, better exhaust...which to my knowledge is the only thing available as of now, not to mention a PCM program change. I'm not sure there's a programmer on the market good enough to handle an engine with all the proper mods mentioned above to take advantage of the ported heads. I'd like to see someone cobble up a sheet metal intake manifold, slap a Holley 650 on one, light it up with a crank trigger, bypass the computer and see how it would run. I bet it'd run like a bitch in heat, but I ain't screwin up my Jeep to find out. Face it, they ain't race vehicles. They were never meant to be.
Old 03-03-2010, 03:03 PM
  #12  
JK Newbie
 
frankie945's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern IN, across from the Ville
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedneckJeep
Here's the thing. Throwin ALL the computer stuff out the window (which you really cannot do), your biggest problem with earlier heads is valvetrain failure. Broken rocker pedestals, broken rocker arms, crapped up pushrods and even some dropped valves plagued those earlier engines. I wouldn't touch the earlier heads with a 10 foot pole. Also, as another poster stated, you'll get nowhere porting heads without at least a better camshaft, which no one makes. Of course, you could pay for a regrind, but then, you have to worry about all that other hot rod stuff like increasing air IN (larger throttle body), increasing fuel flow with bigger injectors, better exhaust...which to my knowledge is the only thing available as of now, not to mention a PCM program change. I'm not sure there's a programmer on the market good enough to handle an engine with all the proper mods mentioned above to take advantage of the ported heads. I'd like to see someone cobble up a sheet metal intake manifold, slap a Holley 650 on one, light it up with a crank trigger, bypass the computer and see how it would run. I bet it'd run like a bitch in heat, but I ain't screwin up my Jeep to find out. Face it, they ain't race vehicles. They were never meant to be.


Right on.
Old 03-03-2010, 04:33 PM
  #13  
JK Super Freak
 
highoctane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frankie945
Cams will only benefit at the top of the rpm range.
Geeze how much misinformation is gonna be posted in this thread. Ill ket someone else explain why but I will say most def not true. Duration, lift, lsa, etc all effect where the cam will make power.
Old 03-03-2010, 04:43 PM
  #14  
JK Newbie
 
frankie945's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern IN, across from the Ville
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by highoctane
Geeze how much misinformation is gonna be posted in this thread. Ill ket someone else explain why but I will say most def not true. Duration, lift, lsa, etc all effect where the cam will make power.
up high that's it. I have put cam's in many cars and all the benefits are in the upper rpm's. Yeah you might get a loopie idle and it sounds mean. But cams only strive in peak of the power band. You might be able to change your redline to 6400rpms. And that would be pushing it on the little 3.8L unless you built the bottom end.
Old 03-03-2010, 05:07 PM
  #15  
JK Junkie
 
spinlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The San Andreas Fault
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RedneckJeep
Here's the thing. Throwin ALL the computer stuff out the window (which you really cannot do), your biggest problem with earlier heads is valvetrain failure. Broken rocker pedestals, broken rocker arms, crapped up pushrods and even some dropped valves plagued those earlier engines. I wouldn't touch the earlier heads with a 10 foot pole. Also, as another poster stated, you'll get nowhere porting heads without at least a better camshaft, which no one makes. Of course, you could pay for a regrind, but then, you have to worry about all that other hot rod stuff like increasing air IN (larger throttle body), increasing fuel flow with bigger injectors, better exhaust...which to my knowledge is the only thing available as of now, not to mention a PCM program change. I'm not sure there's a programmer on the market good enough to handle an engine with all the proper mods mentioned above to take advantage of the ported heads. I'd like to see someone cobble up a sheet metal intake manifold, slap a Holley 650 on one, light it up with a crank trigger, bypass the computer and see how it would run. I bet it'd run like a bitch in heat, but I ain't screwin up my Jeep to find out. Face it, they ain't race vehicles. They were never meant to be.
I agree with Redneck, what about the little black box known as the PCM?

Does anyone know how to reprogram the brains of the powertrain or are you just going to cram as much air and fuel down the intake ports as you can and hope for the best?
Old 03-03-2010, 05:30 PM
  #16  
JK Junkie
 
JPop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lakewood, OH
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frankie945
up high that's it. I have put cam's in many cars and all the benefits are in the upper rpm's. Yeah you might get a loopie idle and it sounds mean. But cams only strive in peak of the power band. You might be able to change your redline to 6400rpms. And that would be pushing it on the little 3.8L unless you built the bottom end.
Just go to comp cams website and look at the cam profiles. Same motor, they can be all over the place. From low end torque hauling cams to high rpm race cams all for the same motor.
Old 03-03-2010, 06:58 PM
  #17  
JK Super Freak
 
highoctane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPop
Just go to comp cams website and look at the cam profiles. Same motor, they can be all over the place. From low end torque hauling cams to high rpm race cams all for the same motor.
Correctumondo! There is a such thing as a street friendly cam. And not to forget rv/truck cams specifically DESIGNED to boost low end and mid range power in a vehicle that specifically has those needs, with a power band of like 1000 to 4500 rpm.
Old 03-04-2010, 05:30 AM
  #18  
JK Newbie
 
frankie945's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern IN, across from the Ville
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPop
Just go to comp cams website and look at the cam profiles. Same motor, they can be all over the place. From low end torque hauling cams to high rpm race cams all for the same motor.
Well, I guess I'm just used to FI applications. Because the rule of thumb to get more hp up high and to raise your rev limit. Cams are needed to get there.
Old 03-04-2010, 05:33 AM
  #19  
JK Jedi
 
RedneckJeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 7,213
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

All you need is a camshaft of 220-240 degrees duration at .050" with around .500 or so lift ground on 110 or 112 lobe centers and that would set it on fire on the bottom end....BUT you'd need all the rest that ain't available yet.
Old 03-04-2010, 07:10 AM
  #20  
JK Newbie
 
lilviper95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glenburn, ME
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just out of curiosity frank, what were the cars that you were putting cams into? I have installed cams in a wide variety of vehicles from 4 cylinders to v8's fuel injected and carb'd and have seen significant gains in the low end, mid range and top end....all depending on the motor they were installed into as well as the specific grind of the cam.


Quick Reply: Cylinder Head compatability



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:51 AM.