Coilover vs standard sping lift
#51
JK Super Freak
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes it does depend on limit straps and bumpstops but if setup correctly you can get X" amount of travel is what they are saying. I think it has to do with the kits that mount the coilovers at an angle on the rear. 12" of travel coilovers will not have 12" travel if they are mounted at say a 30 degree angle you will have less plus this also messes with how the valving and springs are setup because as the axle goes up one inch the coilovers do not compress one inch they compress less so you have to compensate for that. As the shock compresses it changes that angle from 30-40 degrees now you springs and valving are changing as the coilover travels up. With the EVO rear bolt on they actually had King make custom coilovers for that application they are not an of the shelf coilover it sits in the stock shock location which keeps its angle to minimum and also keeps it from changing that much as it travels.
Please correct me if I am wrong!
Please correct me if I am wrong!
Alright so what would be the difference in the front setups of the rebel offroad and the bolt on evo? The both sit about the same and are very similar setups.
One is just a company that many clearly are bias about which they do make good products but nobody has really seen the real facts on the differences. WOL stated something but that doesnt mean its always true. I dont see how one setup only runs 9.5" inches of travel and the other is 12. I understand that angles will make a difference but in the front not that much. Im an engineering major and a 5 degree angle wouldnt change the hypotenuse of a triangle being the coilover difference that much.Now in the rear yes because they are at a steeper angle
#53
JK Freak
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Naperville, Il
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright so what would be the difference in the front setups of the rebel offroad and the bolt on evo? The both sit about the same and are very similar setups.
One is just a company that many clearly are bias about which they do make good products but nobody has really seen the real facts on the differences. WOL stated something but that doesnt mean its always true. I dont see how one setup only runs 9.5" inches of travel and the other is 12. I understand that angles will make a difference but in the front not that much. Im an engineering major and a 5 degree angle wouldnt change the hypotenuse of a triangle being the coilover difference that much.Now in the rear yes because they are at a steeper angle
One is just a company that many clearly are bias about which they do make good products but nobody has really seen the real facts on the differences. WOL stated something but that doesnt mean its always true. I dont see how one setup only runs 9.5" inches of travel and the other is 12. I understand that angles will make a difference but in the front not that much. Im an engineering major and a 5 degree angle wouldnt change the hypotenuse of a triangle being the coilover difference that much.Now in the rear yes because they are at a steeper angle
#55
Sponsoring Vendor
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FULLERTON,CA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dlincoln91
Alright so what would be the difference in the front setups of the rebel offroad and the bolt on evo? The both sit about the same and are very similar setups.
One is just a company that many clearly are bias about which they do make good products but nobody has really seen the real facts on the differences. WOL stated something but that doesnt mean its always true. I dont see how one setup only runs 9.5" inches of travel and the other is 12. I understand that angles will make a difference but in the front not that much. Im an engineering major and a 5 degree angle wouldnt change the hypotenuse of a triangle being the coilover difference that much.Now in the rear yes because they are at a steeper angle
#56
JK Super Freak
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#58
JK Freak
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Naperville, Il
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#59
JK Super Freak
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they are running 14" ones on there own jk and it seems fine?
i would just think the fronts would be the same almost besides having a double throwdown which would be for better ride and offroad feeling.
but in travel sense i would think the front would be similar.
NOW the rear is no comparison for sure... The cantilever is the way to go like someone said above. it creates a straight coilover with a cantilever pushing down on the axle.
I have been studying this stuff using my notes from vector statics and physics
#60
JK Freak
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Naperville, Il
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rebel says you can do 14" coilovers...
they are running 14" ones on there own jk and it seems fine?
i would just think the fronts would be the same almost besides having a double throwdown which would be for better ride and offroad feeling.
but in travel sense i would think the front would be similar.
NOW the rear is no comparison for sure... The cantilever is the way to go like someone said above. it creates a straight coilover with a cantilever pushing down on the axle.
I have been studying this stuff using my notes from vector statics and physics
they are running 14" ones on there own jk and it seems fine?
i would just think the fronts would be the same almost besides having a double throwdown which would be for better ride and offroad feeling.
but in travel sense i would think the front would be similar.
NOW the rear is no comparison for sure... The cantilever is the way to go like someone said above. it creates a straight coilover with a cantilever pushing down on the axle.
I have been studying this stuff using my notes from vector statics and physics