Coilover vs standard sping lift
#111
Ok, that's a fair response. I was just asking cause sometimes it 'seemed' like you were answering for EVO or had inside info. That's all.
I don't know you, and I wasn't saying you were bought. All I was asking was if there was any conflict of interest. That's all. I think that was a valid question for a user of the site to ask.
I don't know you, and I wasn't saying you were bought. All I was asking was if there was any conflict of interest. That's all. I think that was a valid question for a user of the site to ask.
#112
Former Vendor
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
16 Posts
chirp, chirp, chirp.
REBEL OFF ROAD - You guys have been looking at this thread on and off for a long time now and I've yet to hear you state for the record just how much vertical travel your coil over kit yields both front and rear. This isn't some kind of trick question. May I remind you that you are the one who dug up this old thread to call me out and now, I have to wonder why the sudden silence.
REBEL OFF ROAD - You guys have been looking at this thread on and off for a long time now and I've yet to hear you state for the record just how much vertical travel your coil over kit yields both front and rear. This isn't some kind of trick question. May I remind you that you are the one who dug up this old thread to call me out and now, I have to wonder why the sudden silence.
#114
Former Vendor
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
16 Posts
Per King's website, non race application 2.0 12" coilover:
Compressed: 19"
Extended: 31"
Rebel Off Road RECON coilover conversion, completely bolt on, with attached Currie AntiRock links, tires at 37 psi, level terrain:
Compressed Front: 19"
Extended Front: 31"
Overall travel: 12" (zero contact with front driveshaft)
Compressed Rear: 22"
Extended Rear: 31"
Overall travel: 9" (with room to go in the rear bump as pictured)
Front Droop:
Front Compressed:
Rear Compressed:
Rear Droop:
Front Driveshaft:
#117
JK-Forum Founder
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
No problem, and we are happy to answer any questions you or any forum member has.
Per King's website, non race application 2.0 12" coilover:
Compressed: 19"
Extended: 31"
Rebel Off Road RECON coilover conversion, completely bolt on, with attached Currie AntiRock links, tires at 37 psi, level terrain:
Compressed Front: 19"
Extended Front: 31"
Overall travel: 12" (zero contact with front driveshaft)
Compressed Rear: 22"
Extended Rear: 31"
Overall travel: 9" (with room to go in the rear bump as pictured)
Per King's website, non race application 2.0 12" coilover:
Compressed: 19"
Extended: 31"
Rebel Off Road RECON coilover conversion, completely bolt on, with attached Currie AntiRock links, tires at 37 psi, level terrain:
Compressed Front: 19"
Extended Front: 31"
Overall travel: 12" (zero contact with front driveshaft)
Compressed Rear: 22"
Extended Rear: 31"
Overall travel: 9" (with room to go in the rear bump as pictured)
up front, trying to make your kit drop this much, i found the front drive shaft would bind (something i would consider to be a problem) and based my numbers on it. i can only imagine that is why you installed limiting straps on the jk i saw. but hey, without the straps, you have clearly proven me wrong.
as for the rear, i appreciate your honesty by saying you only got about 9" of travel as i got a total of 9.5" at a full bump. clearly a case where just because you can run 12" coil overs doesn't mean you get 12" of vertical travel.
#118
Former Vendor
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
16 Posts
thanks for the pics and for posting up your numbers for the record
up front, trying to make your kit drop this much, i found the front drive shaft would bind (something i would consider to be a problem) and based my numbers on it. i can only imagine that is why you installed limiting straps on the jk i saw. but hey, without the straps, you have clearly proven me wrong.
as for the rear, i appreciate your honesty by saying you only got about 9" of travel as i got a total of 9.5" at a full bump. clearly a case where just because you can run 12" coil overs doesn't mean you get 12" of vertical travel.
up front, trying to make your kit drop this much, i found the front drive shaft would bind (something i would consider to be a problem) and based my numbers on it. i can only imagine that is why you installed limiting straps on the jk i saw. but hey, without the straps, you have clearly proven me wrong.
as for the rear, i appreciate your honesty by saying you only got about 9" of travel as i got a total of 9.5" at a full bump. clearly a case where just because you can run 12" coil overs doesn't mean you get 12" of vertical travel.
#119
Former Vendor
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
16 Posts
You are absolutely correct, and it's a great point. For the photos taken above, this customer's JK (Blue Raider) was put on a forklift in the exact same state it drove to us in. Ready to go offroading. There are countless tricks we could have done to get a few more notches on the tape measure. We did not adjust secondary nuts, all sway bar links were connected (many customers and off roaders don't even run front connected links), tires were aired up, and drive shafts were connected.
#120
JK-Forum Founder
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
We would like to point out that the rear bump in that photo still has room to compress, as does the rear coilver. The bumpstop can in the rear compressed photo is an early prototype and isn't in use in our current kit. Will grab a JK with our current rear and compress it to show we do get a full 12" of rear compression.
Last edited by wayoflife; 07-19-2012 at 12:30 PM.