Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Best short arm kit

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-12-2013, 08:21 PM
  #41  
JK Jedi
 
Maertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsbmg

Well then at least fix your build link so we can see what you got going on
Lol my build thread on here kind of died. Its more up to date on jkowners and Jeepforum. I am by no means an expert bit have been tinkering with this jk a decent amount. just checked the link it worked for me.

Also dirt Whats ur insight about front/rear trackbar height? I know your double triangulated so it dont affect your rig, but you've got alot more knowledge than me.

Last edited by Maertz; 12-12-2013 at 08:29 PM.
Old 12-13-2013, 03:40 AM
  #42  
JK Junkie
 
GJeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Unless it's a custom-designed & built suspension, or long-armed independent suspension on aluminium frame and carbon fiber body Jeep, no lift is perfect...
And there would probably be criticizers of that too.

However, a bolt-on lift CAN be pretty good. You can see how well the Metal Cloak lift behaves.
Check, for instance, how level the Jeep tends to stay with a lot of flex, or how little the body moves when sprinting, while the wheels move up & down all over the place.
As for the rear track bar, no tweaking would stop it from moving the axle sideways, which spoils roll and directional stability. The simplest & cheapest solution is to replace it with a CRC Link, regardless of the lift make.
Old 12-13-2013, 06:57 AM
  #43  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
TheDirtman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest Reno, NV
Posts: 6,222
Received 366 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

My thoughts on track bars are to run them as high and as flat as you can to increase the roll center and minimize the amount of axle shift due to the arc that that the track bar travels in, much like the lower control arms. You may have other things that can keep you from running it level such as having to keep the front parallel to the drag link and up travel clearances.
Old 12-13-2013, 07:01 AM
  #44  
JK Jedi
 
Maertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
My thoughts on track bars are to run them as high and as flat as you can to increase the roll center and minimize the amount of axle shift due to the arc that that the track bar travels in, much like the lower control arms. You may have other things that can keep you from running it level such as having to keep the front parallel to the drag link and up travel clearances.
But what about in referance of having a rear track bar super high and the front in the stock spot? Wouldnt that throw weight distribution off having the roll center vary from front to rear so drastically? Or am i looking at it wrong?
Old 12-13-2013, 07:12 AM
  #45  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
TheDirtman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest Reno, NV
Posts: 6,222
Received 366 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

Its not ideal but the higher the rear is, the higher the roll center will be even if the front is at stock height. I would think it would put increased twist stress on the body as well with the front wanting to roll while the rear is resisting. You could also reduce body roll with the track bars in the factory position by using coils with increased spring rates or by using stiffer torsion bars.
Old 12-13-2013, 07:17 AM
  #46  
JK Jedi
 
Maertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
Its not ideal but the higher the rear is, the higher the roll center will be even if the front is at stock height. I would think it would put increased twist stress on the body as well with the front wanting to roll while the rear is resisting. You could also reduce body roll with the track bars in the factory position by using coils with increased spring rates or by using stiffer torsion bars.
Thanks for the insight. I know its not this simple, but is it safe to say that raising the rear 6.5 and the front not at all, might come out to the overall roll center of say the front and rear at 3.5?
Old 12-13-2013, 07:20 AM
  #47  
JK Super Freak
 
JKred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Torrington CT
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
Its not ideal but the higher the rear is, the higher the roll center will be even if the front is at stock height. I would think it would put increased twist stress on the body as well with the front wanting to roll while the rear is resisting. You could also reduce body roll with the track bars in the factory position by using coils with increased spring rates or by using stiffer torsion bars.
I just explained the same thing in the MC thread....

What raising that rear trackbar bracket does is get the roll center (the average height of the trackbar mount points, by which the CG of the vehicle rotates about for that axle) of the rear axle closer to the CG of the vehicle, making the rear more stable in corners on the street, and in off camber situations off road. (YES sway bars and springs/shocks play into this stability as well).

In theory, the rear roll center should be higher than the front by some degree, giving you a positive roll axis (a theoretical line drawn betwen the two roll centers front and rear). The more poitive (higher rear) the more roll understeer (tendancy to steer out of a corner with body roll). The more more neutral or negative, the more roll oversteer (tendancy to steer into a corner).

So back to the MC kit, by raising that rear bracket way up, you really stabilize the rear, but you've drastically changed the way the vehicle will handle a corner. Roll understeer is MUCH more friendly, however, than oversteer, which is downright scary (that would be like flipping and raising the front, and leaving the rear stock high... terrifying to drive). They basically give a high level of rear stability with a little sacrifice of handeling. Flipping the front draglink and raising the front trackbar will give you a higher front roll center, lowering your positive roll axis a bit, giving less understeer....
Old 12-13-2013, 07:25 AM
  #48  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
TheDirtman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest Reno, NV
Posts: 6,222
Received 366 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

You could throw it in a 4 link calculator like the one you can get off pirate and inter the variables to get what the differences would be.
Old 12-13-2013, 07:28 AM
  #49  
JK Jedi
 
Maertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thanks will do
Old 12-13-2013, 10:08 AM
  #50  
JK Enthusiast
 
rsbmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 435
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GJeep
The simplest & cheapest solution is to replace it with a CRC Link, regardless of the lift make.
I have seen Full tractions videos on their CRC Link, pretty interesting. Feedback seems pretty positive from the folks running it.


Quick Reply: Best short arm kit



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:25 AM.