Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Atx slab with beadlock vs. normal 17" aluminum rim?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-07-2012, 03:39 PM
  #11  
JK Super Freak
 
GCM 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjminner
Ill just throw in a downside to a beadlock is the constant maintenance of having to torque the bolts
I would have to disagree. There is no "constant maintenance" of checking the torque on the ring bolts, it's not like it's a weekly thing. I have run beadlocks on my daily drivers for about 15 years now. I check them maybe every month or two, it takes about 5 minutes to do all four wheels. If you are running one of the top name brand wheels and not some homemade job, you shouldn't have issues. We are talking about 24-32 bolts per wheel, that's a lot of surface area clamping force, if you lost a bolt on the trail or around town, you probably wouldn't know it until you were back home doing a check on the bolts. I rarely, if ever, have a bolt that has loosened up. I would hardly call that constant maintenance, I check my oil more often than then I check my ring bolts.

Edit: The ATX Slabs are absolutely one of, if not the best, beadlock wheel out on the market right now.

Last edited by GCM 2; 05-07-2012 at 05:41 PM.
Old 05-07-2012, 05:54 PM
  #12  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
ryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: corona,CA
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Do you see that going from an aluminum standard 17" rim to a 17" atx slab could be a reason that could cause any extea stress on a rubicon Dana 44 axle?
Old 05-08-2012, 11:57 PM
  #13  
JK Enthusiast
 
RedFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^^Weight difference should be negligible in that case, correct?
Old 05-09-2012, 01:34 PM
  #14  
Sponsoring Manufacturer
 
EVO MFG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FULLERTON,CA
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GCM 2
I would have to disagree. There is no "constant maintenance" of checking the torque on the ring bolts, it's not like it's a weekly thing. I have run beadlocks on my daily drivers for about 15 years now. I check them maybe every month or two, it takes about 5 minutes to do all four wheels. If you are running one of the top name brand wheels and not some homemade job, you shouldn't have issues. We are talking about 24-32 bolts per wheel, that's a lot of surface area clamping force, if you lost a bolt on the trail or around town, you probably wouldn't know it until you were back home doing a check on the bolts. I rarely, if ever, have a bolt that has loosened up. I would hardly call that constant maintenance, I check my oil more often than then I check my ring bolts.

Edit: The ATX Slabs are absolutely one of, if not the best, beadlock wheel out on the market right now.
good post!
Old 05-09-2012, 01:52 PM
  #15  
JK Freak
 
RodCyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

A little off topic, but bead lock related:

I have always wondered why is only the front side of the wheel bead-locked?

What about the rear/inside facing part of the wheel?

Isn't the inside part of the wheel also susceptible to breaking the bead at low pressures?
Old 05-09-2012, 02:56 PM
  #16  
JK Super Freak
 
highoctane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjminner
Ill just throw in a downside to a beadlock is the constant maintenance of having to torque the bolts
One torque check per month, about 15 min. You could even do every 2 weeks. That's 30 min per month. The maintenance isn't as constant as you would believe. Once per YEAR I remove the bolts and rings, clean the bolts, apply new anti seize, and replace any bolts that need it. This takes maybe 2 - 3 hrs, once a year.
Old 05-09-2012, 03:10 PM
  #17  
JK Super Freak
 
GCM 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RodCyn
A little off topic, but bead lock related:

I have always wondered why is only the front side of the wheel bead-locked?
The outside tire sidewall comes into contact with surfaces more than the inside.

Originally Posted by RodCyn
Isn't the inside part of the wheel also susceptible to breaking the bead at low pressures?
It does happen rarely, but if this is becoming a constant problem with your wheels then you have four choices;
-you are airing down too much, keep more psi in the tire
-run a double beadlock wheel = outside and inside lock rings
-run an internal beadlock style rim
-take an Offroad driving course, you may need to refine your driving techniques slightly
Old 05-09-2012, 04:41 PM
  #18  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
ryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: corona,CA
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Anyone try omf bead locks?



Quick Reply: Atx slab with beadlock vs. normal 17" aluminum rim?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:56 AM.