Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Anyone wish they did NOT go 5.13?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-27-2008, 11:21 AM
  #51  
JK Junkie
 
kntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know mine did 60 at 2000rpms with 4.10 and stock tires.
According to your chart it should have been 1782 rpms.
Old 01-27-2008, 03:05 PM
  #52  
JK Enthusiast
 
adaycj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sv650
... We all realize our speedometers are not accurate; same with the Tachometer.
SV
A tach based on the crank signal on OBDII and newer (CAN) vehicles should be dead on. I have worked on hundreds, if not thousands, of vehicles with high res crank sensors with a scan tool hooked up and I have not found one tach to be wrong. Nefarious practices of motorcycles manufactures aside, we should be able to count on our tachs.

I agree however that the data gets screwed up by guesses, bad memories, and inaccurate speedos. It is the same reason that a performance modification that increases engine efficiency by less than a percent can net 2 MPG according to many users.

+5 on the overgeared part. Not only is rotating mass increased, but most of the modified rigs with big tires have lifts and accessories. Adding more wind resistance and weight to the equation.

Regearing past the stock point will also add one more interesting twist to the equation. Many people are used to slow speedos and short odos with bigger tires. When you overgear you get a fast speedo and a long odo. At least it makes the MPG look better before corrections.
Old 01-27-2008, 03:34 PM
  #53  
JK Super Freak
 
boots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: P-burg, NJ.
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I tought I was confused before.

With all the numbers, and plus and minuses of weight and air drag, not to mention the gravitational pull of the extra weight because I had a Big Mac for lunch. I don't know what gear to go with. 4:88's or 5:13's

When all is said and done, I guess it's up to each individual to pick what gears they will run with what tire combination. I for one am still confused.

But heck, I still have another week to decide.
Old 01-27-2008, 03:50 PM
  #54  
JK Super Freak
 
UCLA JK Rida''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

B:

I hope you enjoy whatever ratio you decide to go with. Incidentally, this thread has been mad helpful to me. I'm still awhile from upgrading to lift, gears, wheels, and tires...but it has given me great assistance in deciding what to roll with. 5.13s and 35s seems to be a safe bet with 2 door, automatic, and aftermarket bumpers and winch (which I already have).


Russ D.
Old 01-27-2008, 03:52 PM
  #55  
JK Enthusiast
 
Sv650's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SE BC Canada
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boots
I tought I was confused before.

With all the numbers, and plus and minuses of weight and air drag, not to mention the gravitational pull of the extra weight because I had a Big Mac for lunch. I don't know what gear to go with. 4:88's or 5:13's

When all is said and done, I guess it's up to each individual to pick what gears they will run with what tire combination. I for one am still confused.

But heck, I still have another week to decide.
You could just buy what makes you happy!

SV
Old 01-27-2008, 04:05 PM
  #56  
JK Super Freak
 
boots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: P-burg, NJ.
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Sv650
You could just buy what makes you happy!

SV
Yes, you are right. The best thing is I have it narrowed down to just two gear sets. 4:88's and 5:13's

Last edited by boots; 01-27-2008 at 05:40 PM.
Old 01-27-2008, 04:07 PM
  #57  
JK Enthusiast
 
Sv650's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SE BC Canada
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kntr
I know mine did 60 at 2000rpms with 4.10 and stock tires.
According to your chart it should have been 1782 rpms.
The numbers I quoted do not allow for any slippage that might occur in the A/T.

Also, if the tires are actually 31.5, your speedo is 5% out, and you misread your tach by 50 rpm due to parallax error or equipment error, the numbers are pretty close!

Also is the diff actually 4.10, or 4.11 or..... , is the transmission 0.69 or 0.685 or.....? Small differences are multiplied (pun intended) throughout the equations I used. There may also be rounding errors in the calculations the author used in creating the calculator.

There's too many variables in the equipment available to us in this instance to quibble over about 200 rpm. However, the circumference of the tire translates accurately back to the crankshaft, if you have accurate numbers for each of the steps.

Also, remember, 4.10's with either 35s or 37s are already better than the stock 3.21s with 32s!

SV
Old 01-27-2008, 04:26 PM
  #58  
JK Enthusiast
 
Sv650's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SE BC Canada
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boots
Yes, you are right. The best thing is I have it narrowed down to just to gear sets. 4:88's and 5:13's
Based on what I learned from digging around to create the above list, I'd consider 5.13 for an auto on 37s, and 4.88s for a 6 speed!

SV
Old 01-27-2008, 04:46 PM
  #59  
JK Junkie
 
kntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sv650
Based on what I learned from digging around to create the above list, I'd consider 5.13 for an auto on 37s, and 4.88s for a 6 speed!

SV
Exactly!!!!!
Old 01-27-2008, 05:23 PM
  #60  
JK Enthusiast
 
Ben Hedrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AZ Bulldog
I can't answer just yet, I took this picture about an hour ago. I also was really torn between 4.88 and 5.13's, but I have 37's and have read that a lot of people w/ 35's and 5.13's are happy so I just went for it! I'll report back tomorrow w/ MY opinion...




Sorry about the picture quality.
AZ Bulldog,
Sidebar: How do you like your Fox Shocks? I am think about changing my shock to an adjustible style or a resivor style. What do you think?

Thanks, Ben


Quick Reply: Anyone wish they did NOT go 5.13?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 PM.