Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

37's on 3" lift

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-04-2014, 06:51 AM
  #21  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
TheDirtman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest Reno, NV
Posts: 6,222
Received 366 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

35's can be done pretty easy with minimal lift or no lift and some flat fenders. The less you have to do to the suspension the better off you will be and the JK has ability to fit much larger tires then the TJ did without the big lifts.
Old 09-04-2014, 07:10 AM
  #22  
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
 
JKdreamer0309's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Reflecting back on what you said earlier. 5.33 gears in an auto JKU would be better than 4.88 if I'm running 35's?
Old 09-04-2014, 07:13 AM
  #23  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
TheDirtman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest Reno, NV
Posts: 6,222
Received 366 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

If you have hills in your area 5.13 would be my choice. If near sea level and flat with lots of highway traveling then 4.88 may give you a little better mpg.
Old 09-04-2014, 11:45 AM
  #24  
JK Enthusiast
 
lkjk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: None
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would wait to drive it before you re-gear personally. I have the 3.8 auto tranny and am running 35s on the stock 4.10s getting 14-16mpg city/highway - i do live in CO so I am driving mtns frequently. I am on the fence about going to 37s which is why I haven't regeared, but I have been running this setup for a year and honestly it isn't bad. I am slower and it is not ideal but with my 35s regearing is not at the top of my list
Old 09-04-2014, 12:04 PM
  #25  
JK Enthusiast
 
WARLOCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Laurentians, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have 35 and aev 2.5 + geo brackets and this is a very good DD ride. Ride is better than stock. I would not change anything on it.

Some times I dream of 37's but I'm not ready to make the sacrifice and the much more investment required.
Old 09-04-2014, 12:45 PM
  #26  
JK Freak
 
PsychoCupcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lexington Park, MD
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Like the previous poster, I'm running the AEV 2.5" lift with the correction brackets. Got about 3" of lift out of it even with heavy front and rear bumpers. I am running 37s and it IS my daily driver and weekend trail warrior. That said, I have way more than $5k invested in order to run this setup. Trimmed the fenders myself so that was no cost but it was essential. The bigger tires made an adjustable front track bar a necessity. Even with that and wheel spacers AND 4.5" of backspacing, I still rub my tires on the frame. This was not a problem when I previously had 35s. I have also regeared... I have a 2012 auto so I went with 4.88. Did the regear myself but it still wasn't cheap all said and done. Do I regret going from 35s to 37s? Not one damn bit. But be ready for a lot more cost associated with that option and breaking things/wearing things out faster.

Last edited by PsychoCupcake; 09-04-2014 at 03:35 PM.
Old 09-04-2014, 01:08 PM
  #27  
JK Jedi Master
FJOTM Winner
 
nthinuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin <--> Colorado Springs
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JKdreamer0309
So there really is a rubicon that has stock 44's??
For non-rubicons, they are all d30 front with d44 rear. (with the exception of a few very early models, with build dates prior to Jan07, that came with a rear d35. And 'possibly' a few 07's that came with a front rubi44?)

For rubicons, they are all d44's front and back.
The front rubi d44 housings are basically the same as the d30. Same tube diameter, tube thickness, length, same C's/brakes/knuckles/hubs. The difference is inside. Front rubi44's have a factory e-locker, the bigger d44 gears, and 30spline inner axle shafts instead of the 27spline shafts on the d30. They both use the same 32spline outer shafts.
The rear rubi44 housing is basically the same as the non-rubi44, but the pumpkin is different to allow the use of the factory locker. The gears are the same as the non-rubi44, but the shafts are 32spline as opposed to the non-rubi 30spline, and the rubi shafts are different lengths than the non-rubi.

Rubi axles come with 4.10 gears, non-rubi's with 3.21 or 3.73. (some non-rubi's can be found with 4.10, and the newest year rubi's might be found with either 3.73 or 4.10).

The factory lockers can not be used in the standard housings, and there are only (3?) aftermarket lockers that can be used in the rubi housings if a locker fails.

The rubi also comes with a tcase with a better ratio. For most people, anyway? (4:1 instead of 2.72:1) And also has the push-button e-disco, if you are lazy.



If there isn't a big price difference, go for the rubi.
Old 09-05-2014, 01:00 AM
  #28  
JK Enthusiast
 
deepjeep13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm running 35s on my JKUS an it's hard to even tell there's a difference in ride quality. I dream of 37s but I could spend money in better places. Personally if I didn't wheel my jeep I wouldn't bother modding it. My jk is brand new still and is used scratched and wheels hard.
Old 09-05-2014, 04:35 AM
  #29  
JK Freak
 
GoBig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: South Bay-Los Angeles
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nthinuf
For non-rubicons, they are all d30 front with d44 rear. (with the exception of a few very early models, with build dates prior to Jan07, that came with a rear d35. And 'possibly' a few 07's that came with a front rubi44?) For rubicons, they are all d44's front and back. The front rubi d44 housings are basically the same as the d30. Same tube diameter, tube thickness, length, same C's/brakes/knuckles/hubs. The difference is inside. Front rubi44's have a factory e-locker, the bigger d44 gears, and 30spline inner axle shafts instead of the 27spline shafts on the d30. They both use the same 32spline outer shafts. The rear rubi44 housing is basically the same as the non-rubi44, but the pumpkin is different to allow the use of the factory locker. The gears are the same as the non-rubi44, but the shafts are 32spline as opposed to the non-rubi 30spline, and the rubi shafts are different lengths than the non-rubi. Rubi axles come with 4.10 gears, non-rubi's with 3.21 or 3.73. (some non-rubi's can be found with 4.10, and the newest year rubi's might be found with either 3.73 or 4.10). The factory lockers can not be used in the standard housings, and there are only (3?) aftermarket lockers that can be used in the rubi housings if a locker fails. The rubi also comes with a tcase with a better ratio. For most people, anyway? (4:1 instead of 2.72:1) And also has the push-button e-disco, if you are lazy. If there isn't a big price difference, go for the rubi.
It is my understanding that the rear D44 Rubicon has thicker gears than the D44 Non-Rubicon (Sahara, etc).
Old 09-05-2014, 05:37 AM
  #30  
JK Enthusiast
 
The Black Jeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: West Point, Utah
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GoBig

It is my understanding that the rear D44 Rubicon has thicker gears than the D44 Non-Rubicon (Sahara, etc).
The non Rubicon d44 has 27 spline axles and the Rubicons have 32 spline axles so yes they are more stout than the standard d44


Quick Reply: 37's on 3" lift



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 PM.