Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

37" Lift and Suspension Help and Advice - Daily Driver

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-19-2013 | 11:48 AM
  #21  
Yellowfin's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by jk.bushwacker
well just cause you haven't seen it, it must suck on the rocks I really wanted to post this cause there just inst enuff talk on this site supporting less in more. I would prob just recommend a very mild lift 1-2.5" up front and 1-1.5" in the rear. that will fit 35s no prob, with a little trimming 37s will fit and all you need is a regear and support your Cs. pretty cheap IMO and you keep the jeep almost stock and at low center a gravity. pretty much perfect for a DD IMHO. but if you wanna throw down a bunch of cash go ahead its your wallet. But I'm sure with the mild lift and even 35s he would be able to go wherever he wants and have a solid DD too. 37s wont make too much dif here nor there since its only one more lil inch of clearance.

there is a lot wrong with going a 3.5-4" lift. you will need some more after market parts. this costs money and well is just a waste. if im on 37s mild lift and you are 37s and 3.5-4" lift, we have the same clearance, you might have a lil more in the belly but you still get hung up on the same shit as I would. personally I would rather not screw with the geometry to get such a trivial amount of articulation at the risk of making me spend more money or troubleshoot issues (death wobble, axle alignment, driveshaft angles etc...) that the new bigger lift and aftermarket parts will introduce. I run a LowCOG build and I love it but what do I and MOPAR know...
Damn, man. You act like I just insulted your mother. Never said the lower forty sucks in the rocks. But judging from the build specs on it, it appears that it was built more along the lines of handling sand dunes. If it works in the rocks, great. Just doesn't seem like it would without some additional articulation.

And you see that I didn't go more than 2.5" of lift for the purpose of keeping my rig more stable with the lcog. Don't have any intention of going higher, either. And if you read my original post (1st after the OP's) you'll see, too, that I support the less is more theory. I suggested the most minimalistic 2,5" lift RK offers, short of a budget boost, because I know it works.
Old 09-19-2013 | 12:40 PM
  #22  
Monte417's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 1
From: East Meadow, NY
Default

Originally Posted by jk.bushwacker
well just cause you haven't seen it, it must suck on the rocks I really wanted to post this cause there just inst enuff talk on this site supporting less in more. I would prob just recommend a very mild lift 1-2.5" up front and 1-1.5" in the rear. that will fit 35s no prob, with a little trimming 37s will fit and all you need is a regear and support your Cs. pretty cheap IMO and you keep the jeep almost stock and at low center a gravity. pretty much perfect for a DD IMHO. but if you wanna throw down a bunch of cash go ahead its your wallet. But I'm sure with the mild lift and even 35s he would be able to go wherever he wants and have a solid DD too. 37s wont make too much dif here nor there since its only one more lil inch of clearance.

there is a lot wrong with going a 3.5-4" lift. you will need some more after market parts. this costs money and well is just a waste. if im on 37s mild lift and you are 37s and 3.5-4" lift, we have the same clearance, you might have a lil more in the belly but you still get hung up on the same shit as I would. personally I would rather not screw with the geometry to get such a trivial amount of articulation at the risk of making me spend more money or troubleshoot issues (death wobble, axle alignment, driveshaft angles etc...) that the new bigger lift and aftermarket parts will introduce. I run a LowCOG build and I love it but what do I and MOPAR know...
Jk. Bushwacker
Any info on your build? pics? thanks
Old 09-19-2013 | 01:19 PM
  #23  
jk.bushwacker's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 401
Likes: 1
From: location location location
Default

Originally Posted by Yellowfin
Damn, man. You act like I just insulted your mother. Never said the lower forty sucks in the rocks. But judging from the build specs on it, it appears that it was built more along the lines of handling sand dunes. If it works in the rocks, great. Just doesn't seem like it would without some additional articulation.

And you see that I didn't go more than 2.5" of lift for the purpose of keeping my rig more stable with the lcog. Don't have any intention of going higher, either. And if you read my original post (1st after the OP's) you'll see, too, that I support the less is more theory. I suggested the most minimalistic 2,5" lift RK offers, short of a budget boost, because I know it works.
oh buddy I never meant to insult you and I am def not upset at all. I just wanted to share a dif perspective than most ppl have on this forum. don't get me wrong a jeep on a 6" lift running 44s is sweet as hell but it costs a pretty penny and takes a lot of work to get it right. Most ppl prob wont need anything close to that. the ones who will prob already know exactly how they will build it. for the rest of us, it just makes $en$e to try and Keep It Simple Stupid. lol pls don't take offense to that its just the way I see things I'm in the rocks, mud, sand, snow all the time a lot rougher than those pics you posted (again not trying to insult you) and I have never had an issue. I just wanted to throw out what you can do without causing a lot of issues and it's up to each individual to do whatever they what. There is no right or better way, it just boils down to budget and how much time/effort you want to put into your jeep. I personally like to spend my time wheeling, so I built my jeep to be solid so im in the rocks and not in the shop
Old 09-19-2013 | 01:42 PM
  #24  
Yellowfin's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by jk.bushwacker
oh buddy I never meant to insult you and I am def not upset at all. I just wanted to share a dif perspective than most ppl have on this forum. don't get me wrong a jeep on a 6" lift running 44s is sweet as hell but it costs a pretty penny and takes a lot of work to get it right. Most ppl prob wont need anything close to that. the ones who will prob already know exactly how they will build it. for the rest of us, it just makes $en$e to try and Keep It Simple Stupid. lol pls don't take offense to that its just the way I see things I'm in the rocks, mud, sand, snow all the time a lot rougher than those pics you posted (again not trying to insult you) and I have never had an issue. I just wanted to throw out what you can do without causing a lot of issues and it's up to each individual to do whatever they what. There is no right or better way, it just boils down to budget and how much time/effort you want to put into your jeep. I personally like to spend my time wheeling, so I built my jeep to be solid so im in the rocks and not in the shop
No worries, man. We have the same thought pattern. I don't beat on my rig at all, but I have every confidence that if I did, it would be able to withstand what I could throw at it. Although....I would like to add the Artec truss kit and hydro assist in the near future. I'm like you, though....I see no reason to lift any higher than I already have. Don't need it. And my rig is just as capable a any of the others I wheel with. I think my limiting factor is my lack of confidence in my own abilities as a driver. And not so much that I can't drive; I just don't take very many chances because I'd like to be able to drive my rig home at the end of the day. It's at least not a daily driver, though.
Old 09-19-2013 | 07:51 PM
  #25  
JKJEDIINTRAINING's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Ashburn, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Yellowfin
No worries, man. We have the same thought pattern. I don't beat on my rig at all, but I have every confidence that if I did, it would be able to withstand what I could throw at it. Although....I would like to add the Artec truss kit and hydro assist in the near future. I'm like you, though....I see no reason to lift any higher than I already have. Don't need it. And my rig is just as capable a any of the others I wheel with. I think my limiting factor is my lack of confidence in my own abilities as a driver. And not so much that I can't drive; I just don't take very many chances because I'd like to be able to drive my rig home at the end of the day. It's at least not a daily driver, though.
I think you both make very good arguments for the less is more approach. I am going to seriously consider that approach; however, let's say I want a higher lift which means lot's of domino adjustments:

Is there one manufacturer or lift type that provides a better road experience that still provides plenty of off road capability? Everyone has provided great insight - very helpful. Thanks!
Old 09-20-2013 | 05:53 AM
  #26  
jk.bushwacker's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 401
Likes: 1
From: location location location
Default

Originally Posted by JKJEDIINTRAINING
I think you both make very good arguments for the less is more approach. I am going to seriously consider that approach; however, let's say I want a higher lift which means lot's of domino adjustments:

Is there one manufacturer or lift type that provides a better road experience that still provides plenty of off road capability? Everyone has provided great insight - very helpful. Thanks!
each lift is dif... all spring rates will be dif. actual lift height vs. advertised lift height will vary from each manufacturer. the key to a LowCOG build is to stay within the factory specs so you don't cause new issues. the sweet spot I have found is no more than 2.5" in the front and 1.5" in the rear of actual lift height. can you go a lil higher than that without issues, maybe. it all will depend on your build. for example heavier bumpers and a winch can knock down a lift by 0.5" or more so it will be dif for everyone. as far as on road driving exp that is very subjective IMO, everyone has their own idea of whats a comfy ride its not gonna be easy you will have to do your research but ultimately you will not know until the lift is on your jeep. you are modifying a vehicles suspension. there is no ultimate lift kit out there, they all have their pros and cons. if you like how the jeep rides stock, you might wanna keep it as close to stock as possible. if you want to change the riding characteristics, you're def going to run into a few things that you prob didn't consider initially so don't be surprised when you do. hope that was helpful.
Old 09-20-2013 | 07:33 AM
  #27  
Yellowfin's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by JKJEDIINTRAINING
I think you both make very good arguments for the less is more approach. I am going to seriously consider that approach; however, let's say I want a higher lift which means lot's of domino adjustments:

Is there one manufacturer or lift type that provides a better road experience that still provides plenty of off road capability? Everyone has provided great insight - very helpful. Thanks!
From everything I've read, lots of people like AEV for great on-road feel, while still getting pretty decent off-road performance, too. Lots of people in the Metal Cloak Game Changer camp, too. Ride quality really boils down to the coils and the shocks. Yeah, there are factors that other parts play, but for the most part, it's the stiffness of the springs and dampening ability of the shocks that decide how good or bad ride quality will be.
Old 11-18-2015 | 03:46 PM
  #28  
Julien's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Qc
Default RK coils

Originally Posted by Flexer07
Rock krawler 3.5 and 37s. Great ride, quality, stance, and amazing off road

Attachment 498547
Are those RK 03100/03101 coils? (2.5" on 4 doors, 3.5" lift on 2 doors?)

Thanks. Here's mine with 3100/3101

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4188.JPG
Views:	841
Size:	97.5 KB
ID:	630425  
Old 11-19-2015 | 05:29 AM
  #29  
JayswranglerX's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by JKJEDIINTRAINING
I have a 2009 JKU Rubicon with manual transmission that I am looking to lift with 37’s . I have read through various posts on builds and have a general understanding of what I need to do, but would like some input on what components, lifts (type, amount, manufacturer), modifications/upgrades I should include to make this a very capable off road beast with plenty of flexing but still a great DD (put about 20K in annual miles). Not too concerned with MPG, but ways to address the horrible gas usage would be appreciated. I don’t want to go cheap on the build and appreciate quality – I have $ to spend but don’t want to go crazy. In general, I would rather spend marginally more and buy something quality than go cheap and regret it later. I know that I will need to reinforce or upgrade a number of components and would rather make the modifications/upgrades now than have a situation down the road where something failed.

My general priorities:

1) Dependable daily driver that rides great – preferably better than or same as stock
2) Very capable off road performance, mainly trails with some rock crawling (live in Virginia)
3) Wow factor – this may be my compensating for something, but I would like to make this a fun to drive, fun to show vehicle
4) Reasonable (read quality and value) cost
5) Do all the lift/mod/upgrades that relate to the lift/suspension/driving one time rather than in phases

Also, I live in the Northern Virginia area and would be interested in thoughts on getting this work done. Just joined local jeep group but really don’t know anyone to help with a wrenching party . Happy to help with the work (although I would be learning not leading). Otherwise, is there a local garage/mod shop I should consider?

So, if you were building your dream 37” JKU manual transmission DD / off road beast, how would you put it all together? Please be specific and comprehensive as this is all relatively new to me and please don’t assume that I know something that may seem obvious to others on this board.
4" Evo on 37" Courser MXT's.

Front drop brackets and stock arms. DL flip.

Rear synergy lower fixed arms with TF Alpine adjustable uppers and Superlift track bar with the duroflex joints.

I don't rock crawl just moderate trails through the woods etc.

Drives good in the highway no wandering.

3.8 so it does need to be regear-ed when funds allow

Been this way for 3 years with no gussets or axle sleeves yet and no problems.

Sent from my SM-N920T using JK-Forum
Old 11-19-2015 | 05:29 AM
  #30  
JayswranglerX's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by JayswranglerX

4" Evo on 37" Courser MXT's.

Front drop brackets and stock arms. DL flip.

Rear synergy lower fixed arms with TF Alpine adjustable uppers and Superlift track bar with the duroflex joints.

I don't rock crawl just moderate trails through the woods etc.

Drives good in the highway no wandering.

3.8 so it does need to be regear-ed when funds allow

Been this way for 3 years with no gussets or axle sleeves yet and no problems.

Sent from my SM-N920T using JK-Forum


Click image for larger version

Name:	ForumRunner_20151119_082936.png
Views:	188
Size:	798.0 KB
ID:	630481

Sent from my SM-N920T using JK-Forum



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 PM.