33" a/t load range on 2dr
#1
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
33" a/t load range on 2dr
looking to put 33"s on. no muds for me. i'll add some weight with bumpers but no winch and no tire carrier, no roof rack, and a soft top. would load d's be too stiff. its my DD as well. thanks for all the help.
#2
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
JK Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radials made that ply stuff obsolete. They don't have that many plies anymore. (There may an oddball exception. ) The Service Description is far more useful if one bothers to learn about them.
#4
JK Super Freak
Yeah, my thinking is that a load range D is on the stiff side for a JK. And most passenger car tires have a "standard" load rating not C. I think C is perfect for the JK, I just wish we had more choices available. For example, you can get BFGs in the C rating in 15 inch sizes but everthing in 16 inch is D and E. I love BFGs but don't really want the added weight and stiffness. Goodyear does make the Duratrac in a 16 inch load range C though.
#5
JK Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Delgriffth
in i correct in thinking a 2 door jk soft top is on the light side for load d's? would i have to air down a bit? thanks
#6
JK Junkie
#7
JK Super Freak
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"D" isn't too much. Your "light weight" 2-door is still about 4,500lbs. The 4-door, depending on equipment options I'd say is about 4,700 to 5,000lbs. Shoot, some F150 trucks only weigh 5,000 lbs.
Add bumpers, skids, winch, rack, gear, etc and you can easily end up with a 7,000lbs JK.
I've run 255/85r16 BFG M/T tires on our old Montero Sport and the load range D wasn't harsh at all. Set air pressure right and match it up with a more supple shock and away you go. The weight of the montero sport is very similar to a JK with front and rear steel bumpers. Both are plagued by gutless engines to boot.
I'd have no qualms with a D tire. I probably couldn't tell the difference between it and a C except when cornering as the D will be a bit stiffer side wall which should mean more crisp turn in.
Add bumpers, skids, winch, rack, gear, etc and you can easily end up with a 7,000lbs JK.
I've run 255/85r16 BFG M/T tires on our old Montero Sport and the load range D wasn't harsh at all. Set air pressure right and match it up with a more supple shock and away you go. The weight of the montero sport is very similar to a JK with front and rear steel bumpers. Both are plagued by gutless engines to boot.
I'd have no qualms with a D tire. I probably couldn't tell the difference between it and a C except when cornering as the D will be a bit stiffer side wall which should mean more crisp turn in.
Trending Topics
#8
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
""D" isn't too much. Your "light weight" 2-door is still about 4,500lbs."
haha point taken, sure feels lighter then an f150, especially when the wind is blowing it all over the highway. then again its about as aerodynamic as a brick. thanks for the knowledge guys.
haha point taken, sure feels lighter then an f150, especially when the wind is blowing it all over the highway. then again its about as aerodynamic as a brick. thanks for the knowledge guys.
#9
JK Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Notice it says "Ply Rating"? That's for old farts that still think in bias ply terms. Read the sidewalls of your tires. I'll bet you a beer they don't have 8 plies. The Load Range is the modern equivalent. The Service Description (not on your high-level chart) is even more enlightening.