Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

18" Trail Grapplers: 35" or 295's?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-06-2011, 02:46 PM
  #1  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
pjwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 18" Trail Grapplers: 35" or 295's?

I am hoping to order some Nitto Trail Grappler's this week for my JKU. I have a 2.5" TF coil lift. I cannot decide between the 295's or 35's.
Specs from Nitto website:
35x12.50R18, E rated, 35.04" tall, 13.39" wide, max load of 3415 at 65psi
LT295/70R18, E rated, 34.57" tall, 11.73" wide, max load of 4080 at 80psi

Any insight? Pros? Cons?
Thanks!
Old 09-06-2011, 03:29 PM
  #2  
JK Enthusiast
 
kabookie10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: salem, ohio
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went with 35 12.50's. I like the wider tire.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00218.jpg
Views:	3649
Size:	77.5 KB
ID:	207691   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00216.jpg
Views:	6890
Size:	87.7 KB
ID:	207692   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00217.jpg
Views:	1381
Size:	73.9 KB
ID:	207693   Click image for larger version

Name:	1103001827a.jpg
Views:	1024
Size:	34.6 KB
ID:	207694   Click image for larger version

Name:	1103001828a.jpg
Views:	836
Size:	31.0 KB
ID:	207695  

Old 09-06-2011, 03:32 PM
  #3  
JK Newbie
 
ekms377's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Rhome,Texas
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Daily driver? If so and a lot of paved miles.....go with the narrow tire.
Old 09-06-2011, 03:56 PM
  #4  
JK Enthusiast
 
f2fast4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine is a DD and I used to have wide Nitto Terra Grapplers (325/60R18) and it literally took both hands on the steering wheel all the time or the tires would take the steering wheel from you.

So, I ditched them and went with the 295/70R18 Trail Grappler for two reasons: 1) taller tire than my old and 2) narrower tire. Now I can drive with one arm again and enjoy the ride. The 1/2" difference in height between the 35" and the 295 is ignorable plus the tire is (I recall) $50 or $60 per tire less expensive. I got a set of five delivered to my door for $1,305 and that is a great deal.

Added bonus: you can mount the 295 on your stock spare tire carrier and then carry a real spare tire.

Click image for larger version

Name:	35's 022.jpg
Views:	1180
Size:	99.8 KB
ID:	207720Click image for larger version

Name:	35's 020.jpg
Views:	1223
Size:	83.7 KB
ID:	207721Click image for larger version

Name:	35's 021.jpg
Views:	2112
Size:	98.3 KB
ID:	207722

Last edited by f2fast4u; 09-06-2011 at 05:34 PM.
Old 09-06-2011, 04:12 PM
  #5  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
pjwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My more practical side says 295, but as good as the 295's look kabookie's 35's look great.

Kabookie, how is the handling? any of the control issues mentioned?
Old 09-06-2011, 04:27 PM
  #6  
Super Moderator
 
Ryan0260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Posts: 11,043
Likes: 0
Received 83 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pjwing
I am hoping to order some Nitto Trail Grappler's this week for my JKU. I have a 2.5" TF coil lift. I cannot decide between the 295's or 35's.
Specs from Nitto website:
35x12.50R18, E rated, 35.04" tall, 13.39" wide, max load of 3415 at 65psi
LT295/70R18, E rated, 34.57" tall, 11.73" wide, max load of 4080 at 80psi

Any insight? Pros? Cons?
Thanks!
Go with the 35's. My friend runs the 295's and they look real narrow from the front and back
Old 09-06-2011, 04:33 PM
  #7  
JK Newbie
 
mpaone1040's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am having the same dilemma, I just picked up my new deep cherry 2011 JK sport last week, no mods yet, but thinking 2.5" teraflex, 18x9 ATX artillary teflons with 35x12x18 terra grapplers. seeing Kabookies I sold me on it until the other poster mentioned the improved handling of the 295s. hmmmmm what to do.
Old 09-06-2011, 04:43 PM
  #8  
JK Freak
 
Tiburon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Bronx, N.Y.
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

295/70R17 Trail Grapplers.

Old 09-06-2011, 04:55 PM
  #9  
JK Enthusiast
 
kabookie10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: salem, ohio
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pjwing
My more practical side says 295, but as good as the 295's look kabookie's 35's look great.

Kabookie, how is the handling? any of the control issues mentioned?
Everyone is right here. I am a Daily Driver and see 95% paved road. I like the wider tire look and i wasn't worried about weight and gas milage. I wanted the wider tire personally. They are not out of control. THey do tend to follow ruts in the road, but its not uncontrollable. I would think the 295's will do the same to an extent. I can drive down the road one handed no problem. However, i had a Ram 1500 and noticed the same thing. I just got use to it over time.
Old 09-06-2011, 05:40 PM
  #10  
JK Newbie
 
shawnlennes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got nitto grapplers 35's, they technically measure just a smidge over 34 with a tape measure go with 35 size


Quick Reply: 18" Trail Grapplers: 35" or 295's?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.