The Results are In....
12-06-2006, 01:13 PM
#51
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello All; As for sound, its noticeable.. Unbearable, not really.. Its only really noticeable under load.. Taking off, etc.. With just a soft-top you can barely here it going down the highway @ 70.. At least now it sounds like a jeep.. I will try to get some sound clips up this weekend..
Low RPM torque - @ 1650 it was averaging gains of 26.5hp / 25tq.. Not bad to me..
I don’t have any hook ups as for the parts. I paid full retail..
- $250 for the AEM
- $260 Jet Performance Stage II chip.
The exhaust cost me about $300 only because we tried both Dual and Single set ups..
My exhaust shop says it should only cost about $180 for the Single Magna Flow System..
Having the muffler relocated is nice because now I have all the extra room under the back for whatever I may come up with..
Just to give everyone an Idea of the Dual Exhaust setup.. @ 2000 RPM’s it actually lost HP and TQ over stock…
Low RPM torque - @ 1650 it was averaging gains of 26.5hp / 25tq.. Not bad to me..
I don’t have any hook ups as for the parts. I paid full retail..
- $250 for the AEM
- $260 Jet Performance Stage II chip.
The exhaust cost me about $300 only because we tried both Dual and Single set ups..
My exhaust shop says it should only cost about $180 for the Single Magna Flow System..
Having the muffler relocated is nice because now I have all the extra room under the back for whatever I may come up with..
Just to give everyone an Idea of the Dual Exhaust setup.. @ 2000 RPM’s it actually lost HP and TQ over stock…
Much appreciated!!
12-06-2006, 02:09 PM
#53
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-07-2006, 08:20 PM
#54
JK Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern, Oregon
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is the Dyno print out .. The bottom 2 curves are stock and the top 2 are modified.. Hope its clear enough to read..
Edited--- Please keep in mind these numbers are off. Please read my first post in this thread..
Edited--- Please keep in mind these numbers are off. Please read my first post in this thread..
Last edited by 1BADJK; 10-22-2007 at 10:33 AM.
12-08-2006, 01:37 PM
#56
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Quebec city, Canada
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very good, torque number are great and there is an improvement on the lower part of the curve. Are those number corrected ones. Stock, it should have 202hp and 237lb/ft , your stock number seems very close to spec? Thanks
Last edited by joss097; 12-08-2006 at 01:42 PM.
12-08-2006, 03:29 PM
#57
JK Freak
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Saint Petersburg, Fl
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey thanks again for doing all this work for everybody. Its good stuff that we can all use. If I woulda known the single exhaust would give better numbers cause the 3.8 likes the backpressure i would have gone with one. Oh well, the duals look badass. lol
12-08-2006, 05:16 PM
#58
JK Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern, Oregon
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree the duals looked very BadA$$.... And sounded Awesome.... but oh well.
