Show your 33's
10-21-2008, 04:59 PM
#382
JK Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mission Viejo, Ca
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-21-2008, 05:48 PM
#383
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone wish they went with 35's? I went with 33's for fuel mileage as well not having to swap my gears. Purely for looks i kind of regret my choice but i guess if i had went with 35's i would be wanting 37's.
10-21-2008, 06:01 PM
#384
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cause in the next 3 months I am going to get a Rugged Ridge Front Bumper, and a winch, and even with the slightly longer coils, the spacers will make it perfectly even then, so instead of basically redoing everything to add the spacers in 3 months, i just went ahead and added them in now
Sounds good...Jeep looks great
10-22-2008, 10:25 AM
#386
JK Freak
----------------
Now playing: ohGr - Timebomb
via FoxyTunes
10-24-2008, 07:07 AM
#387
JK Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: México DF
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bigbluejk, very little rubbing at full flex, apparently only at the rear. Will try again this weekend. About the MPG, can not tell you yet, as its been a few days since installed them. I noticed just a little higher consumption vs the 32 stock tires.
