Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

xtreme 4x4 JK part 3

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-26-2011 | 06:38 AM
  #1  
stolls's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

In a 1/2 hr on Spike, Extreme 4x4 - Supercharged JK part 3 will be on. That would be 10am eastern time.

Last edited by stolls; 02-26-2011 at 06:41 AM.
Old 02-26-2011 | 08:48 AM
  #2  
Dralphy's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, Va
Default

Watched it, was good to see. Wish that could've been my rig. Hah.
Old 02-27-2011 | 04:01 PM
  #3  
Tired Bear's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, Nv.
Default

Saw it too. That Hemi seemed a little weak.
Old 02-27-2011 | 07:53 PM
  #4  
Paws's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Vista, CA
Default

I wish there was a comparison on the same vehicle. Kind of an unfair comparison.

With the RIPP SC what kind of engine longevity are we looking at? Are they good for 100K 5years under normal to hard driving like a V8 would be? The SC is only 5K so you definitely get your $ worth upfront. If the stress causes the other parts to go bad that might cause you to spend another 10-15k on parts and labor.

What do you guys think?
Old 02-28-2011 | 05:28 AM
  #5  
TN_JK_GA's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Northern, TN
Default Me too

I would like to know how many miles and what kind, if any, issues people running the SC have had.
Old 02-28-2011 | 05:39 AM
  #6  
sixty5vdub's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Hunstville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Tired Bear
Saw it too. That Hemi seemed a little weak.
I agree. I was one of the Hemi JKs used for this. Didn't get on tv, but did get to do some pulls on the dyno. Both the Hemi and SC numbers were lower than we all expected. But thanks to the guys at Extreme 4x4, RIPP, and a couple of Hemi JKers, we have real world numbers as to what these two options put out.
The RIPP SC was tuned as far as it would go (I think it was), and it put down some really good numbers. The Hemi's were both AEV kits, using the tune that AEV locks into their ECU. Which, in my opinion, is probably a little tame to keep everything safe.

If you look at the stock numbers for the Jeep 5.7L used with the Hemi swap, I think they are rated at somewhere around 330-345 HP and around 360-375 TQ, measured at the flywheel. The rear wheel HP and TQ numbers from this test were around 213 HP and 250 TQ. That is about a 40 percent loss at the wheels.

Originally Posted by Paws
I wish there was a comparison on the same vehicle. Kind of an unfair comparison.
That would have been great. Unfortunately for us, no two JKs are the same. Unless somebody wants to build two identical Jeeps, one with a SC and one with a Hemi........ Or do a swap from SC to Hemi (or vice versa) on the same Jeep.



Anthony

Last edited by sixty5vdub; 02-28-2011 at 05:46 AM.




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:23 AM.