Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

Weight of the tires

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-16-2010 | 09:58 PM
  #1  
JKU Rubicon's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Here
Default Weight of the tires

Okay

First read this:

KM2 tire 33X12.5 R15 58 lbs
KM2 tire 33X12.5 R16 59 lbs
KM2 tire 33X12.5 R17 67 lbs

Bigger is the diameter of the rim, heavier is the tire

Why? I don't understand because the R15 tire has more rubber than the R16, and the R16 tire has more rubber than the R17
Old 10-17-2010 | 07:00 AM
  #2  
lonestar rubi's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

More steel to support the short side wall? Due to the larger diameter, maybe

Hell, those tires are light! Toyo M/T. 35x12.50x17.... Try 80#'s. "NO RIM" just tire
Old 10-17-2010 | 09:10 AM
  #3  
kittisman's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States
Default

Originally Posted by JKU Rubicon
Okay

First read this:

KM2 tire 33X12.5 R15 58 lbs
KM2 tire 33X12.5 R16 59 lbs
KM2 tire 33X12.5 R17 67 lbs

Bigger is the diameter of the rim, heavier is the tire

Why? I don't understand because the R15 tire has more rubber than the R16, and the R16 tire has more rubber than the R17
I think your missing realizing something if those tires are all the same sidewall size than each tire is larger therefore heavier. Example: it's not the exact same tire with just a different size hole for the rim.
Old 10-17-2010 | 11:51 AM
  #4  
JKU Rubicon's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Here
Default

Originally Posted by kittisman
I think your missing realizing something if those tires are all the same sidewall size than each tire is larger therefore heavier. Example: it's not the exact same tire with just a different size hole for the rim.
I don't understand

These 3 tires have the same width and the same diameter.
The 15" has more sidewall that the 17". Therefore, why the 17" is heavier?
Old 10-17-2010 | 12:49 PM
  #5  
Cedo Nulli's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: Beachside, FL
Default

Load ranges have a big part to do with it. IE a "c" load tire will be much softer sidewall than an "e", because of the additional support built into the "e" tire for the increase load.

More radial steel, stiffer compound, etc.

Last edited by Cedo Nulli; 10-17-2010 at 12:59 PM.
Old 10-17-2010 | 08:12 PM
  #6  
JKU Rubicon's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Here
Default

Originally Posted by Cedo Nulli
Load ranges have a big part to do with it. IE a "c" load tire will be much softer sidewall than an "e", because of the additional support built into the "e" tire for the increase load.

More radial steel, stiffer compound, etc.
good point
Old 10-18-2010 | 08:48 PM
  #7  
kittisman's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States
Default

Originally Posted by JKU Rubicon
I don't understand

These 3 tires have the same width and the same diameter.
The 15" has more sidewall that the 17". Therefore, why the 17" is heavier?
If the 3 tires were say 215/75/15,215/75/16, and a 215/75/17 stood side by side the 17" is a larger, therefore heavier tire than the 15".
Old 10-18-2010 | 09:06 PM
  #8  
Red Wings's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by kittisman
If the 3 tires were say 215/75/15,215/75/16, and a 215/75/17 stood side by side the 17" is a larger, therefore heavier tire than the 15".
Right, but a 33" tire is a 33" tire regardless of rim size. I think as mentioned before that it is most likely due to load range.




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 AM.