Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

Spy Shots: 2018 Jeep Wrangler Development Mule

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-08-2015 | 02:38 PM
  #11  
AirJordan613's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by RustyShovel
I think the magazines may have this all wrong. I don't think the longer cowl is to hide additional body length, I think it's to hide the gap where the new, rounded, and more angled windshield will fit. Jeep won't mess too much with the rest of a winning formula, but they've got to increase the rake on the windshield if they're gonna get close to their 30 mph target. (They've also gotta add a diesel.)
I'd bet it's both additional length and the sloped windshield.
Old 09-08-2015 | 02:56 PM
  #12  
thechad07's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Brighton, CO
Default gas tank?

What's with the gas tank hanging down so low in the rear shots?
Old 09-08-2015 | 04:17 PM
  #13  
JamesWyatt's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Allen, TX
Default

Originally Posted by thechad07
What's with the gas tank hanging down so low in the rear shots?
It a cover to hide the upgraded rear axle. I hope. (EDIT) I need glasses I guess. I looked again, and clearly it doesn't cover the rear axle. Doh. (/EDIT)

Last edited by JamesWyatt; 09-08-2015 at 05:31 PM.
Old 09-08-2015 | 04:28 PM
  #14  
JamesWyatt's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Allen, TX
Default

Originally Posted by RustyShovel
I think the magazines may have this all wrong. I don't think the longer cowl is to hide additional body length, I think it's to hide the gap where the new, rounded, and more angled windshield will fit... ...but they've got to increase the rake on the windshield if they're gonna get close to their 30 mph target. (They've also gotta add a diesel.)
(EDIT) I looked again - the windshield angle IS the same as the current one, my mistake (/EDIT) Jeep doesn't need to angle the windshield to get 30mpg using a diesel.
Originally Posted by RustyShovel
Jeep won't mess too much with the rest of a winning formula,
This I agree with. The flares are the old ones (reportedly the side markers are moving off them), and obviously the old doors were hacked to fit. The dealers that saw the revealed JL said it was basically the same as the JK, but shared nothing with it, and I take that to mean things like the grill, door handles, mirrors, flares, hard top/soft top system, and bumpers.

Last edited by JamesWyatt; 09-08-2015 at 05:29 PM.
Old 09-08-2015 | 08:10 PM
  #15  
Machoo's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 538
Likes: 11
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default

I hope that it doesn't get to aerodynamic. I really like the look of my old TJ with the grill that was vertical and not slopped like the JK is. I also like the rake of the TJ windshield. I'm warming up to my JK but I certainly wouldn't want anything more angled than it is now. The jeep that won the war certainly had very few sloped angles.
Old 09-09-2015 | 04:44 AM
  #16  
Blue's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 901
Likes: 1
From: Florida Hill Country (Tallahassee)
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Doiron
I wouldn't draw any conclusions at all about the appearance of the next iteration of the Wrangler. This is probably a test mule for running gear, software changes, etc. Stuff you can't see readily. The longer cowl may suggest more room needed for the engine/transmission. Can a factory Hemi option be on the horizon? Not likely, but nice to dream!
A 6-banger diesel would be good!
Old 09-09-2015 | 04:47 AM
  #17  
Blue's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 901
Likes: 1
From: Florida Hill Country (Tallahassee)
Default

Originally Posted by JamesWyatt
(EDIT) I looked again - the windshield angle IS the same as the current one, my mistake (/EDIT) Jeep doesn't need to angle the windshield to get 30mpg using a diesel. This I agree with. The flares are the old ones (reportedly the side markers are moving off them), and obviously the old doors were hacked to fit. The dealers that saw the revealed JL said it was basically the same as the JK, but shared nothing with it, and I take that to mean things like the grill, door handles, mirrors, flares, hard top/soft top system, and bumpers.
If they truly wanted to help MPG, they could gain .5 to .75 mpg by going to lockout hubs. They could gain another 4 or 5 by buying the RIPP Super charger and getting the costs down on it by mass producing it (for gas engines). A diesel option would also be outstanding. It is crazy how well some of the Rams are doing with diesel relative to current Wranglers. The EPA needs some people to go to Leavenworth and crack rock for about 10 years.
Old 09-09-2015 | 10:49 AM
  #18  
JEEP0785's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: CHARLOTTE,NC
Default Rear axel

the rear axle sits very high, almost like there might be gear reduction hubs. and the front has aluminum knuckles.
Old 09-12-2015 | 12:57 AM
  #19  
Omar Brannstrom's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Malmoe
Default

Clearly the body is longated so a standard jerrycan be fitted without cutting the jerrycan. In the Wrangler Africa concept they had to cut the jerrycan to get it to fit, it should not be neccesary on the next model

Old 09-13-2015 | 03:36 PM
  #20  
Lm7yj's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Jackson mi
Default

We can only hope it's for the diesel option and not a crazy raked windshield.



Quick Reply: Spy Shots: 2018 Jeep Wrangler Development Mule



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:20 PM.