Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

Radius Arms versus 4 link

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-21-2009, 11:36 AM
  #1  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
asjackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Radius Arms versus 4 link

I got to see the difference this past weekend. There was a Grand Cherokee with radius arms, 33" MTs and a JK 'X' with the stock 4 link and Rubi tires, both had open diffs. The JK outflexed the Grand and thus was able to make it over the ledge. The Grand was constantly getting a tire in the air and thus lost traction. The X eventually pulled the Grand up the ledge. Even though they weren't identical vehicles, a case can be made.
Old 04-21-2009, 12:21 PM
  #2  
Sponsoring Vendor
Off Road Evolution Rep
 
Joe Lightfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Palm Desert, Ca
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by planman
I think the general consensus is that radius arms can handle better for high speed or on street performance, but that a 5 link (4 arms plus a trackbar) suspension will flex better offroad.

I do agree with both statements but I wouldnt exacty say your comparing apples to apples. I would say there is a big difference between the cherokee and JK. I run an RE 4.5 long arm kit and if you put me up against the exact same jeep with a 4 link I really dont think you would be able to tell a difference. I have wheeled with just about every kind of jeep/ suspension and I dont think there has ever been a trail I havent been able to do because Im running a radius arm. Just mt 2cents
Old 04-21-2009, 02:42 PM
  #3  
JK Super Freak
 
BlackNorthernJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Interesting topic, I'd like to hear more on this from those running a radius arm
Old 04-22-2009, 11:32 AM
  #4  
Sponsoring Vendor
Off Road Evolution Rep
 
Joe Lightfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Palm Desert, Ca
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlackNorthernJK
Interesting topic, I'd like to hear more on this from those running a radius arm
There has been a few of these debates on this forum and it allways seems to get people fired up. The die hard R.E guys swear by there radius arms and the 4 link guys swear that radius arms dont flex. The R.E is a good kit that has a better than stock hwy ride, but doesnt flex as good as a 4 link kit. I have the R.E kit I love the ride and it takes me on any trail I want to go on. But I do have plans to remove the R.E. and go with TF 4 link and ORE coilovers.
Old 04-22-2009, 11:45 AM
  #5  
JK Freak
 
backwoodjk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Jordan, UT & Prescott, AZ
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The older Grand Cherokee (WJ and older) does not have the BLD feature that the Jk does. A "open" Jk will always have better traction than an "open" non Quadra-drive grand IMO.
Old 04-22-2009, 12:12 PM
  #6  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
asjackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Lightfoot
There has been a few of these debates on this forum and it allways seems to get people fired up. The die hard R.E guys swear by there radius arms and the 4 link guys swear that radius arms dont flex. The R.E is a good kit that has a better than stock hwy ride, but doesnt flex as good as a 4 link kit. I have the R.E kit I love the ride and it takes me on any trail I want to go on. But I do have plans to remove the R.E. and go with TF 4 link and ORE coilovers.
You should get a RTI score. Then someone with a 4 link can get a RTI score. then we can compare. But, we'd still run into issues about differences in shocks, endlinks, tires, etc. I just wanted to state that I saw a radius arm that seemed like the flex was really limited compared to that of a JK with stock suspension. In my mind, I thought the Grand would easily conquer the ledge, and the JK would have troubles, but it was vice versa.
Old 04-22-2009, 03:06 PM
  #7  
JK Super Freak
 
BlackNorthernJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Lightfoot
There has been a few of these debates on this forum and it allways seems to get people fired up. The die hard R.E guys swear by there radius arms and the 4 link guys swear that radius arms dont flex. The R.E is a good kit that has a better than stock hwy ride, but doesnt flex as good as a 4 link kit. I have the R.E kit I love the ride and it takes me on any trail I want to go on. But I do have plans to remove the R.E. and go with TF 4 link and ORE coilovers.
hmmm, this is the first one I've caught. I have been curious about the radius arm...I know nothing of how they perform



Quick Reply: Radius Arms versus 4 link



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:49 AM.