Is the jk smart enough to maximize mpg
#1
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: spokane washington
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is the jk smart enough to maximize mpg
Anyone have any real world data regarding weather or not the 3.8 is able to change timing enough to gain any measureable mpg or hp burning premium vs regular fuel? In my mind, it seems as though it should be able to advance the timing using the knock sensor or other sensors and retard timing for lower octane fuel. Maximum safe advance = maximum efficiency and therefore power right???
#2
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: BFE Indiana
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't agree with that notion whether the JK has it or not! Given the price difference (in my area) I don't think it would be beneficial at all to run premium over the standard grade fuel. I have a Mercedes that recommends "premium only" and it gets standard and the difference is minimal in the mpg stats, but throw in the money factor and the whole notion goes out the door with your money!
#3
JK Super Freak
Your engine has a max commanded spark programed in the stock tune on every OBD2 vehicle. Part throttle ignition timing changes based upon how the vehicle is being driven, operating temp, etc, but WOT timing does not change unless altered by an aftermarket tune or if the engine is overheating.
#4
JK Super Freak
Anyone have any real world data regarding weather or not the 3.8 is able to change timing enough to gain any measureable mpg or hp burning premium vs regular fuel? In my mind, it seems as though it should be able to advance the timing using the knock sensor or other sensors and retard timing for lower octane fuel. Maximum safe advance = maximum efficiency and therefore power right???
I do believe the engine was engineered to run on a certin octain fuel and the sensors were designed to maintain efficiency using that fuel. This was most likely based on the cubic inch, bore and stroke, fuel to air ratio, compression ratio, and exhaust outlet. The sensors, although high tech, are not of the learning and addapting, technology but rather just an I/O matrix, and are not going to enable the engine to come alive. Those days are not yet here.
I believe using a high test fuel in this engine will do nothing more that get deeper into your pocket and may do more harm then good.
I may be wrong though.
#6
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: spokane washington
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well that makes absolutely no sense what so ever... damage it??? perhaps I am too dumb... I was hoping someone had actually tried premium and documented the mpg differences if any... I will try to do it myself. wouldn't take much of an increase in mpg to offset the additional cost. regular is 2.14 and premium is 2.35 at the moment so a 10% increase in mpg would make it even and any more would be a beautiful thing... any hp increase would be a major blessing... wish me luck...
#7
JK Freak
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the manual it says using anything above the recommended 87 Octane may cause engine knock and permanent damage to your engine. Fill your boots tho, I just cant see it making any difference.
Trending Topics
#8
well that makes absolutely no sense what so ever... damage it??? perhaps I am too dumb... I was hoping someone had actually tried premium and documented the mpg differences if any... I will try to do it myself. wouldn't take much of an increase in mpg to offset the additional cost. regular is 2.14 and premium is 2.35 at the moment so a 10% increase in mpg would make it even and any more would be a beautiful thing... any hp increase would be a major blessing... wish me luck...
#9
JK Freak
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russellville, Arkansas
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having worked at commercial pumping stations, I know when the fill a truck with 93 the line has either been flushed with water to the waste tank or you are getting 87 flushed to the fuel truck as well.
So at best you put in 93 and really are getting a mix of 87 or 89 with it. So it is not really 93.
At worst you get a water residual in the line that is flushed into the truck.
then your reliant on your stations placement of their siphon or pump location on the tank to not get water intrusion, also relying on their filters at the station and we all know they change those out often Right??
That being said I always run 92 in mine. Have never had a problem I feel better throttle response on this than lesser octane. I have seen no real judgeable (if that is a word) difference in MPG though. I have also not seen or heard any knocking or temp difference.
The higher the octane the cleaner the fuel the less engine deposits, ie valves etc.............
So at best you put in 93 and really are getting a mix of 87 or 89 with it. So it is not really 93.
At worst you get a water residual in the line that is flushed into the truck.
then your reliant on your stations placement of their siphon or pump location on the tank to not get water intrusion, also relying on their filters at the station and we all know they change those out often Right??
That being said I always run 92 in mine. Have never had a problem I feel better throttle response on this than lesser octane. I have seen no real judgeable (if that is a word) difference in MPG though. I have also not seen or heard any knocking or temp difference.
The higher the octane the cleaner the fuel the less engine deposits, ie valves etc.............
#10
JK Freak
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Florida Hill Country (Tallahassee)
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The are are only a few reasons for high octane fuels. One is higher engine compression. When I am towing with one of my other rigs in the summer, I sometimes use it because it will have cooler exhaust temperatures. Out side of that, there is no real advantage other than spending more money on gas.