Fortune rumor mill
#1
#2
I think the failing publicly traded auto manufacturers want Chrysler to fail, because they are afraid of private companies. It'll be interesting to see what pans out, because private companies don't have to squat compared to public companies. Chrysler was the only company to have positive sales numbers last month.
#3
X2
Bill Ford made the comment about 2 or 3 year ago saying he wanted to take Ford private.. No answering to investors or the market.. And you don't have to have your books open to the public.. I think Chrysler being private is a good thing.. It allows the company to listen to the consumers instead of investors..
Bill Ford made the comment about 2 or 3 year ago saying he wanted to take Ford private.. No answering to investors or the market.. And you don't have to have your books open to the public.. I think Chrysler being private is a good thing.. It allows the company to listen to the consumers instead of investors..
#4
Close, but off a little bit. The 3 Headed Dog is much more interested in cash than earnings. I know this from personal experience in the paper industry ...
#5
That's what I meant. They're not worried about dividends, as stockholders would be. They're interested in how much profit (cash) they can get back either as profits from sales, or making the business look attractive enough that they can sell it for more than they paid, either whole or in pieces. Preferably the latter (in their eyes, not mine).
#6
That's what I meant. They're not worried about dividends, as stockholders would be. They're interested in how much profit (cash) they can get back either as profits from sales, or making the business look attractive enough that they can sell it for more than they paid, either whole or in pieces. Preferably the latter (in their eyes, not mine).
Now if they can just shed the Unions they will actually be able to compete with the foreign automakers. I worry they will not pull it off and will break Chrysler up and sell the parts to the highest bidder. Jeep owned by some Chinese or Indian company like Land Rover will be soon.
Trending Topics
#8
"and the unnecessary Jeep Commander. " A Commander was needed, and I think has been needed since the Wagoneer went away. The problem was they went cheap and just put a bigger box on a GC platform. If they had done the large SUV right, they would have had something with the mystique of a Range Rover at the price of a Tahoe, and kicked the market. Now with CAFE coming, there is a small window to get into the big SUV market.
No go it alones. With CAFE, you need little cars to balance out the real ones.
No go it alones. With CAFE, you need little cars to balance out the real ones.
#9
I think you're right about that. I think the fact that they're looking at all outgoing cash like someone else mentioned is a good indication that they're trying to get a good picture about the goings-on. How bad were Chrysler's books that they cannot figure it out from there!?
#10
X2
Bill Ford made the comment about 2 or 3 year ago saying he wanted to take Ford private.. No answering to investors or the market.. And you don't have to have your books open to the public.. I think Chrysler being private is a good thing.. It allows the company to listen to the consumers instead of investors..
Bill Ford made the comment about 2 or 3 year ago saying he wanted to take Ford private.. No answering to investors or the market.. And you don't have to have your books open to the public.. I think Chrysler being private is a good thing.. It allows the company to listen to the consumers instead of investors..
X3
Ford has gone to the dog's.
And over the past couple years the Chrysler group has made some dull choices for vehicle designs in an otherwise volatile, designer friendly, vehicle market.
Besides, if they don't take if off the market the Chinese will own them eventually anyway.
I'm all for it!