Check the Status of your Jeep JK Wrangler - Order Status Codes
#1351
JK Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grangeville, ID
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ordered August 9th and am still in BG. I am in the process of placing a second order, but I've been pushing it off because I simply can't believe that my original order will not progress. I keep thinking - it has to move to D status this month - but no, every month it's the same. Very frustrating.
#1353
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: East Bay area - Fremont, CA
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been waiting since January 11 until now. Still in BG status since Jan 17. Ordered 2007 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, Auto, Jeep Green, MyGig, Power Conv., Trailer Tow group, and deep tint window. :confused:
#1354
I would say what is unacceptable is the frakked up way Jeep itself handles its orders. They reward the large volume dealers at the expense of the smaller dealers. It is one thing to give some priority to high volume dealers on getting "more" product....but it is another when a CUSTOMER ordering a Jeep waits, and waits and waits simply because they ordered from a smaller dealer. There needs to be some safety valve where time in the queue over-rides the "dealer" allocation factor.
I don't think that when I am ORDERING a vehicle, one of the factors I have to take into account is whether the dealer I am ordering from is going to have "allocation" for my order or not. I expect a smaller dealer to have less inventory....and perhaps no inventory on a model for me to drive to the lot, and pick one out and buy it from the lot. But to me, if you have to order a vehicle, it shouldn't matter where you order it from...it should be processed more on a first in, first out system.
THAT would be one of the first things I would be revamping if I was buying Chrysler.
#1356
I believe they do that to help the smaller dealers too. Otherwise the big guys would order up a crap load of Jeeps for inventory and the little guy would have trouble getting his in.
Jeff (Don-a-Vee)could answer it better though, which I believe he has, about a thousand pages back in this thread.
Jeff (Don-a-Vee)could answer it better though, which I believe he has, about a thousand pages back in this thread.
#1357
Ouch! The strange thing was, I called DC and the lady was kind enough to place me on hold whlie she contacted my dealer to let them know that I have been in BG status for a very long time to see if there was something they could do to push it along. Does anyone know how that works? Sounds almost like each dealer has an alocation in which they can dictate priority? I purchased my Rubi at $500.00 over invoice. Perhaps they are shipping the full MSRP orders first?
#1358
#1359
I would say what is unacceptable is the frakked up way Jeep itself handles its orders. They reward the large volume dealers at the expense of the smaller dealers. It is one thing to give some priority to high volume dealers on getting "more" product....but it is another when a CUSTOMER ordering a Jeep waits, and waits and waits simply because they ordered from a smaller dealer. There needs to be some safety valve where time in the queue over-rides the "dealer" allocation factor.
I don't think that when I am ORDERING a vehicle, one of the factors I have to take into account is whether the dealer I am ordering from is going to have "allocation" for my order or not. I expect a smaller dealer to have less inventory....and perhaps no inventory on a model for me to drive to the lot, and pick one out and buy it from the lot. But to me, if you have to order a vehicle, it shouldn't matter where you order it from...it should be processed more on a first in, first out system.
THAT would be one of the first things I would be revamping if I was buying Chrysler.
I don't think that when I am ORDERING a vehicle, one of the factors I have to take into account is whether the dealer I am ordering from is going to have "allocation" for my order or not. I expect a smaller dealer to have less inventory....and perhaps no inventory on a model for me to drive to the lot, and pick one out and buy it from the lot. But to me, if you have to order a vehicle, it shouldn't matter where you order it from...it should be processed more on a first in, first out system.
THAT would be one of the first things I would be revamping if I was buying Chrysler.
#1360
I believe they do that to help the smaller dealers too. Otherwise the big guys would order up a crap load of Jeeps for inventory and the little guy would have trouble getting his in.
Jeff (Don-a-Vee)could answer it better though, which I believe he has, about a thousand pages back in this thread.
Jeff (Don-a-Vee)could answer it better though, which I believe he has, about a thousand pages back in this thread.
I think I remember the post that you're referring to (way back) - and I think what he was saying was that because the current system is tied to sales, it doesn't allow one dealer to order four times what their previous sales were in order to corner the market. That makes perfect sense to me (and it protects all dealers, to some extent), but I still think that valid customer orders should be given a priority over dealer orders whether the order is made at a large or a small dealership.