3.6 engine on JK 07-11?
#14
JK Super Freak
Originally Posted by RubiDude
You're retarded...you don't care about specs because you can't read.
#15
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(5.7, 6.1 pass emissions) If they were able to put the right size engine in the Jeeps then less people would be wanting a different engine(something bigger with more power 5.7, 6.1, ect) or a whim 3.6 that makes more horsepower while sacrificing torque to a higher rpm.
#17
Originally Posted by TJM12
Just stating my opinion having owned both you dickhead! What an asshole!
#18
JK Super Freak
Originally Posted by RubiDude
Hey shit for brains...I too have had both...anyone who wants to say the 4.0 was all that and without equal is not remembering driving that thing on the hwy..it sucked...just like the JK. That being said I have never been left behind by a TJ and thought only if I had the 4.0 I'da made it! You just need something to bitch about...you're illiterate and it is your time of the month!
#19
JK Junkie
Wasn't this thread about a motor???
Oh yeah, it wasn't about the 4.0, oddly enough.
Referring to someone's sexual orientation in a derogatory way is ignorant. Middle school kids call each other stuff like that.
Its a motor, gentleman. If that's even enough to argue about. Well, apparently it is. Ok, off my box.
I like my 3.8 just fine. Then again, i never had a 4.0 tj either. Hope Im not a cliche, innuendo, or feminine hygiene apparatus.
Oh yeah, it wasn't about the 4.0, oddly enough.
Referring to someone's sexual orientation in a derogatory way is ignorant. Middle school kids call each other stuff like that.
Its a motor, gentleman. If that's even enough to argue about. Well, apparently it is. Ok, off my box.
I like my 3.8 just fine. Then again, i never had a 4.0 tj either. Hope Im not a cliche, innuendo, or feminine hygiene apparatus.