Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

3.6 or 4.0

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-18-2016, 08:09 AM
  #11  
JK Freak
 
mr72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 542
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jedg
Some of that 600lbs is to the credit of the better capability (like wider stance and longer control arms) and likely most is for the plusher amenities...
I think a lot of it is that it's just a physically larger vehicle in every way. Bigger wheels and tires stock, wider track, wider body, longer wheelbase, etc. And bigger stuff to support the other bigger stuff ... bigger axles, heavier transmission (likely), shocks, springs, etc. all (likely) heavier.

And part of it is more "stuff" that is mandated by gov't or to a lesser extent, customer demand, like infotainment system and extra airbags, body bracing, etc.

But mostly it's due to design laziness. Weight of small things was allowed to be added without consideration for its collective impact on the weight of the vehicle, and they responded (eventually) with a much more powerful engine to compensate. But a bigger engine doesn't compensate for extra weight in a turn, or when braking, or when trying to jack the vehicle on the trail, trying to pull it out of a rut, preventing it from sinking in mud, the force with which it slides a tire sidewall across a sharp rock, etc. More weight is never, ever better in any vehicle.
Old 03-18-2016, 09:06 AM
  #12  
DJ1
Former Member
 
DJ1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Add a supercharger if you do more offroading and call it a day...




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 PM.