RUSTY'S OFFROAD 3.25" Lift on 2010 2-door documented
01-21-2010, 01:59 PM
#11
JK Super Freak
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Forest Hill, Maryland
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Running 3.21's on a Rusty's 3.25" with 35"s..Plan on up grading to 4.88's but no rush cause with a manual it's barable. Running with extended brake lines.
05-14-2010, 01:03 PM
#12
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real quick guys, if it comes with extended FRONT quick-disconnects, is there any reason that we could not use the STOCK REAR up front and use the new quick disconnects that come with the Rusty's kit (I'm assuming they are longer than stock to account for lift) in the rear instead of front if we have a Rubicon with e-disco and don't need the quick-disconnect function?
05-17-2010, 11:12 AM
#13
JK Super Freak
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Forest Hill, Maryland
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real quick guys, if it comes with extended FRONT quick-disconnects, is there any reason that we could not use the STOCK REAR up front and use the new quick disconnects that come with the Rusty's kit (I'm assuming they are longer than stock to account for lift) in the rear instead of front if we have a Rubicon with e-disco and don't need the quick-disconnect function?
05-17-2010, 03:07 PM
#14
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Candler, NC
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always was told that to get the best ride out of the vehicle you should have your swaybar parallel to the frame/flat ground. As far as the rears, you do not need disconects in the rear. Flex is plenty enough with the stock components. Adding the disconnects just will add for headaches as the springs will more than likely unseat themselves. Anyone chime in if this is wrong.
I had to get extended bump stops for mine because at full stuff 35's tryed to rip flares off Rusty's said mine was unusual
Also had to change to a different front track bar Rusty's bar will hit crane high clearance diff cover
As far as rear swaybar just needed longer connects and shocks should limit flex not swaybar
05-18-2010, 09:51 AM
#15
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always was told that to get the best ride out of the vehicle you should have your swaybar parallel to the frame/flat ground. As far as the rears, you do not need disconects in the rear. Flex is plenty enough with the stock components. Adding the disconnects just will add for headaches as the springs will more than likely unseat themselves. Anyone chime in if this is wrong.
What I mean is, if my kit came with ONE SET of EXTENDED links (that happen to be quick disconnects) ... why not use them in rear since I have an e-disco and don't need them up front, and then use my OLD rear ones up front? Which is what everyone seems to do with the extended links that come in kits like the TF (those just dont happen to be quick disconnects).
08-27-2010, 10:03 PM
#16
JK Freak
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Plano, Tx
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just order the kit without the quick discos.
Then put the new rear links on the rear and put the old rear links on the front.
Or, or go with the quick discos and put them on the front for a backup when the edisco fails .
Then put the new rear links on the rear and put the old rear links on the front.
Or, or go with the quick discos and put them on the front for a backup when the edisco fails .
