2011 Wrangler Fire - Pics
#1
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We were coming home from a morning down at the beach and noticed some black smoke coming from under the hood, there were no warning lights on the dash so I didn’t think it’d be too serious. Jumped out to pop the hood and saw quite a bit of red fluid on the sand… and then the flames under the hood! Jumped on the radio and had a fire extinguisher there within the minute, but it made no difference, the fire just kept going. We tried using our drinking water to get the fire out and then when that didn’t work, we started shovelling sand into the engine bay to try to get the fire out, but it wouldn’t stop. Within 10 minutes the entire engine bay was on fire and after 20 minutes the whole car had gone up.
We contacted our insurance company, who arranged retrieval of the vehicle and then contacted Chrysler, who assured us there would been a full investigation.
Chrysler flew their investigator across the country to take a look at the remains and determine the cause of the fire. After no news for two weeks despite constant phone calls to Chrysler asking for an update the merely told us that the fire wasn’t a manufacturers defect and there was nothing they could do. When I asked what the cause of the fire was I was bluntly told that I “am not privy to that information” and that they were not legally obliged to disclose that information with us.
Our insurance company had already determined the car a write off but after a bit of prodding we convinced them to do their own investigation. Their investigator came to the conclusion that the fire had done too much damage to determine a cause or ignition source
The car was a 2011 Jeep Wrangler which done less than 28,000kms (17,500mi) and still had over a year left on the warranty. The car had no modifications of any kind and had only been serviced by the dealership it was purchased from.
We were absolutely appalled at how we were treated by Jeep. We would have expected that when a product that they sold exploded into a ball of flames there would have been some sympathy, or at least an effort to assist us recuperate our loss, but there was none. We were incredibly lucky that no one was injured in the fire and also that the incident happened in a location where it couldn’t do much damage to the surrounding area.
We were even more shocked to realize that this is a recurring issue with our model of Jeep!!
#3
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pioneer, CA
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not a defect!? So what, was it destroyed by an alien death ray? You don't need an investigation to know a defect caused that. What non-defect could have possibly caused that in an unmodified vehicle?
Your insurance company should sue Jeep. No reason they should have to pay for that. You either.
Your insurance company should sue Jeep. No reason they should have to pay for that. You either.
#4
![Default](https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
First of all... glad to hear you guys are okay. Hopefully the insurance makes things right for you.
But, I do not understand why you are upset with Chrysler over this. I do not believe Chrysler has indemnification spelled out in any literature I have seen and you have insurance; which is a covered loss according to you (assuming you had sufficient coverage).
Why do you believe Chrysler should pay you a second time or maybe I don't understand what you wanted them to do?
I do agree with you that it was shitty that they wouldn't give you the report. Seems odd, but if the ins company didn't feel it was illegal, I am sure it wasn't. The ins company will get out of whatever they can and often at considerable cost.... they know the gambles aren't worth it.
But, I do not understand why you are upset with Chrysler over this. I do not believe Chrysler has indemnification spelled out in any literature I have seen and you have insurance; which is a covered loss according to you (assuming you had sufficient coverage).
Why do you believe Chrysler should pay you a second time or maybe I don't understand what you wanted them to do?
I do agree with you that it was shitty that they wouldn't give you the report. Seems odd, but if the ins company didn't feel it was illegal, I am sure it wasn't. The ins company will get out of whatever they can and often at considerable cost.... they know the gambles aren't worth it.
#5
![Default](https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Look up the recent recall!! I bet it has something to do with it. I had a transmission leak caused by the power steering lines rubbing on the trans cooler lines, which cause the fluid, while driving, to spray down the bottom of the Jeep across the exhaust. Right around 18K miles is when mine happen. Hot exhaust trans fluid... FIRE!!!
2012 Jeep Wrangler Recalls & Problems - Motor Trend Magazine
Recall ID # 96662 - STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST:HOSE, PIPING, AND CONNECTIONS
2012 Jeep Wrangler Recalls & Problems - Motor Trend Magazine
Recall ID # 96662 - STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST:HOSE, PIPING, AND CONNECTIONS
#6
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
First of all... glad to hear you guys are okay. Hopefully the insurance makes things right for you.
But, I do not understand why you are upset with Chrysler over this. I do not believe Chrysler has indemnification spelled out in any literature I have seen and you have insurance; which is a covered loss according to you (assuming you had sufficient coverage).
Why do you believe Chrysler should pay you a second time or maybe I don't understand what you wanted them to do?
I do agree with you that it was shitty that they wouldn't give you the report. Seems odd, but if the ins company didn't feel it was illegal, I am sure it wasn't. The ins company will get out of whatever they can and often at considerable cost.... they know the gambles aren't worth it.
But, I do not understand why you are upset with Chrysler over this. I do not believe Chrysler has indemnification spelled out in any literature I have seen and you have insurance; which is a covered loss according to you (assuming you had sufficient coverage).
Why do you believe Chrysler should pay you a second time or maybe I don't understand what you wanted them to do?
I do agree with you that it was shitty that they wouldn't give you the report. Seems odd, but if the ins company didn't feel it was illegal, I am sure it wasn't. The ins company will get out of whatever they can and often at considerable cost.... they know the gambles aren't worth it.
I am furious with Chrysler as there should be an expectation that when you purchase a new vehicle that it doesn't spontaneously burst into flames during its intended use! Especially while its still covered by a new car warranty.
The reason I'm posting is for visibility and nothing else. I didnt know that this was a pre-existing issue with the JK when I bought it, so if this post saves someone some heartache I'll be happy...
#7
JK Enthusiast
![Default](https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow Jake, that's scary stuff. Glad no one got hurt.
Oddly I had not heard of Jeep related fire problems either (until now). The transmission overheating is a commonly known issue, but who would have thought it could lead to a JK inferno?
Anyway, a quick Google search led me to this:
Feds expand investigation of Jeep Wrangler fires - CBS News
Thanks for posting the info.
Oddly I had not heard of Jeep related fire problems either (until now). The transmission overheating is a commonly known issue, but who would have thought it could lead to a JK inferno?
Anyway, a quick Google search led me to this:
Feds expand investigation of Jeep Wrangler fires - CBS News
Thanks for posting the info.
Trending Topics
#8
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Amarillo,TX
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not expecting anything from Chrysler now... Our insurance covered most of the damage.
I am furious with Chrysler as there should be an expectation that when you purchase a new vehicle that it doesn't spontaneously burst into flames during its intended use! Especially while its still covered by a new car warranty.
The reason I'm posting is for visibility and nothing else. I didnt know that this was a pre-existing issue with the JK when I bought it, so if this post saves someone some heartache I'll be happy...
Last edited by rooster1976; 01-06-2014 at 01:34 AM.
#10
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ravenna,ohio
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow! This did have the auto trans right? This kind of stuff should not happen. If no mods were on this vehicle then I wonder what Chrysler thinks caused this? Glad everyone's OK..........